Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > General Hunting Forums > Whitetail Deer Hunting
 Velocity verses Energy. (the debate) >

Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

Community
Whitetail Deer Hunting Gain a better understanding of the World's most popular big game animal and the techniques that will help you become a better deer hunter.

Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-09-2004, 12:43 PM
  #51  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 182
Default RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

AHAHAHAHA ZREX I WINNNNNN
BROWNING.308 is offline  
Old 12-09-2004, 01:09 PM
  #52  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,425
Default RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

Looks like some of you guys need to be introduced to Jack O'Connor...
This is the old Elmer Keith vs Cactus Jack debate...
nchawkeye is offline  
Old 12-09-2004, 01:12 PM
  #53  
Nontypical Buck
 
Firehawk7309's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,253
Default RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

SeaHunter,
Thanks for the diagram, you've made it clear enough for me. I want the Viagra bullet in Figure B.
Firehawk7309 is offline  
Old 12-09-2004, 01:46 PM
  #54  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

.308 if you's of stayed in school you would have comprehended what has been said here.
#1--- energy is not what kills.
#2--- wound channels do
#3--- bigger bullets leave bigger wound channels.
#4--an expanded bullet leaves a bigger wound channel, and what expands a bullet ? VELOCITY.

So you see my little grass hopper, on a whitail deer my little 100 gr bullet traveling faster than your 165 gr bullet is going to expand more leaving a bigger wound channel. At a 100 yds the difference will not be noticable, but at 3-4- 5 hundred yds when your pea shooting .308 is falling off the scale and hitting dirt my .243 with 2200 fps velocity@500 yds is gonna mushroom and blow right through a whitail and kill better.

Ha Ha ! your wrong.
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 12-09-2004, 02:07 PM
  #55  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 618
Default RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

Wow, this is stupid. 3 different forums about the same thing, with the same people arguing the same argument. What a waste of hard-drive space!
minnesotahunter is offline  
Old 12-09-2004, 02:14 PM
  #56  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

heres the comparo again little grass hopper.
-----velocity---------- muzzle----100----200----300----400---500
243 85 gr Sierra------3320-----3070--2830---2600--2380--2180
.308 150 nos Partition-2840-----2600--2380---2170--1960--1770
----energy-
243----------------------2080------1770--1510--1280---1070---890-
308----------------------2680------2255---1880--1560--1285---1050

bullet drop@ 200 yd zero-----300yds---400yds---500yds-
243-------------------------------5.5------16.1-------32.8
308--------------------------------8-------23.4-------47.9
wind drift----------------------300yds----400yds---500yds
.243 85gr-------------------------6.3-----11.6-------18.8
.308 150 gr-----------------------8.1-----15.1-------24.8
So you see the choice is obvious for whitail deer. At the longer ranges the .243 surpasses the .308 by far,with its velocity and accuracy . the bullet will expand more leaving a bigger wound channel and killing faster. the .308 drops significantly more,making longer shots harder.
Remember enrey is not what kills , wound channels do. Bigge wound channels with increased velocity will create hydro staic shock and kill even quicker.
Ya you better sell it and buy some education. LOL.
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 12-09-2004, 02:16 PM
  #57  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

ORIGINAL: minnesotahunter

Wow, this is stupid. 3 different forums about the same thing, with the same people arguing the same argument. What a waste of hard-drive space!
you have a choice of not coming back to this thread you know.
Just having some fun with Br.308 thats all.
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 12-09-2004, 03:57 PM
  #58  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 182
Default RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

ENERGY (ft-lbs)
Cartridge Type Bullet Muzzle 100 200 300 400 500
Premier Core-Lokt Ultra 100 PSP CLU 1945 1629 1356 1120 917 745
Premier Core-Lokt Ultra 150 PSP CLU 2648 2159 1744 1394 1102 864


ZREX u have a little more velocity but have no energy to do anything when it hits....if its such a great long distance rifle why dont the snipers use them.....i think they use my 308 dont they
BROWNING.308 is offline  
Old 12-09-2004, 04:00 PM
  #59  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 182
Default RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

just incase u didnt see my question i asked u 2 days ago here it is again


ok ZREX i have a question to ask u if it is velocity that kills not energy what would u rather take on a big game hunt ur .243 or a 308 or a 30-06 id like to see u shoot a 1000+lb bull with ur 243.....the thing will probly laugh at u...............I REST MY CASE ITS ENERGY NOT VELOCITY


u miswell shoot a buffalo too with all ur velocity
BROWNING.308 is offline  
Old 12-09-2004, 04:01 PM
  #60  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 618
Default RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

Yeah, but zrex, it’s still funny to listen to you rant and rave, and call people little grasshoppers.
minnesotahunter is offline  


Quick Reply: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.