yea have to call bs on it too. if it truly was killed with a tomahawk at least the front of the handle would be covered in blood. and the 50 yd part i'm not buying either... that's a long ways to kill something with just thrown by hand.

yea I dunno.... it would be impressive if true...altho not sure how he threw it through brush at fifty yards hahaha
-Jake

I was thinking the same thing about the location of the wound too. He also said it dropped as soon as he hit it and then he said it died in thick brush so he brought it out and cleaned up the deer and the tomahawk to make it "more tasteful" for pictures.

So he threw a tomahawk at a deer at 50 yards in thick brush? I've never come across a more bad-a$$ guy in my life if that's the case! This is total BS.

I killed a deer with a bottle cap once at 35 yards. Looked like a slug wound. I flicked it with my thumb and ring finger. Double lung pass-through. I flick maybe 75-100 bottle caps a day. You'd be amazed at how proficient you can get with Natty caps. It takes a lot of practice. Here's what it looks like:

Very little blood on anything = BS

I dont think the wound has enough blood around it. I would think there would be more bruising.

If it was 50 feet I might believe it not 50 yards.

Exactly what I was thinking.

Have you nothing more to contribute?

Just more BS froma troll

you would sure have to have a long arm to "thrust" a Tomahawk 50 yds...

Bet you 20 bucks he can't throw a 50 yard group measuring 5ft.