HuntingNet.com Forums - Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)

- Whitetail Deer Hunting (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/whitetail-deer-hunting-4/)

- - Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR) (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/whitetail-deer-hunting/274582-roger-jarvis-buck-possible-new-wr.html)

RE: Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)

Quote:

Now maybe you can tell me about that other deer I was apparently talking about.

Quote:

Thats just not right. That deer should not be a world record. If a hunter did not kill it then it doesn't deserve it

Better?

Quote:

I just cannot see a completely wild deer getting that big.

I'm sure you can't. That doesn't mean they dont exist. Have you ever seen the record books?:eek:

RE: Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)

Quote:

ORIGINAL: M.Magis

Quote:

Now maybe you can tell me about that other deer I was apparently talking about.

Quote:

Thats just not right. That deer should not be a world record. If a hunter did not kill it then it doesn't deserve it

Better?

Quote:

I just cannot see a completely wild deer getting that big.

I'm sure you can't. That doesn't mean they dont exist. Have you ever seen the record books?:eek:

Yes, a hunter is not a person that hunts on high-fenced/game farm lands....

There's no way thats a completely wild deer.

RE: Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)

Quote:

ORIGINAL: wjbsmith

if thats the case johnny why would B & C have it on there website as being shot in Mo?

This massive buck is reported to have been taken by Roger Jarvis in Missouri. No other information about where or when it was taken is known.

The above is from the B & C website.The ranch that this buck was killed on claims to be free range, but unless Mr. Jarvis has contacted them (B&C) directly, its all speculation.I suspect they were e-mailed the story from someone. Did you click on the link I provided? The guy that posted the pic claims to have done work for Mr. Jarvis, who in the oil business.

RE: Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)

Quote:

ORIGINAL: 1shotkill1993

Quote:

ORIGINAL: M.Magis

Quote:

And I really doubt that that animal could of been wildly grown

Do you really have any idea what you're talking about? It sure seems like you're just replying to see your name. You're talking about two separate deer,and you don't seem to realize it. And just because you have never seen a deer like that, does that automatically mean they don't exist? :eek:

How am I talking about two different deer.

I am talking about the one in the picture. I just cannot see a completely wild deer getting that big.

Thats all I'm saying. Now maybe you can tell me about that other deer I was apparently talking about.

simple. the current world record(which wasnt killed by a hunter) was brought up. then the 1 with the picture is the 1 that was recently killed and has the possibility of being the new world record.

and as far as growing them that big in the wild, the current wr was a free range deer. if the genetics are there and there is a good food supply then please tell me what could keep a deer from growing that big? what about that monster typical that was killed a few wks back, the field and stream buck, would you say it wasnt free range as well? they do exist in the wild my friend. they are just few and far between.

RE: Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)

There are plenty of deer that would score over 200 inches, you just don't see them. To say that the deer was not wild is absurd. Do you believe in GOD? Have you ever seen him?

RE: Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)

I don't know who killed it or where it was killed, but I would love to see a video of how they officially measure the rack. Big dang buck.