.270 Win. VS. 7mm. Rem. Mag...Would I see a difference on game?
#11
Fork Horn
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: pa soon to be greenup county ky
sounds like you could be doing alot of shooting (which is always a good thing!)so as jag said if for one reason go for the .270 for ammo price my 7mm ammo gets expensive quick.
#12
Thread Starter
Fork Horn
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Northeast Texas
Thanks for the input folks!
To reply to one of the previous post, I've always wanted a .280, but finding one in a left handed stainless/synthetic model is pretty hard unless I have it custom built.
I guessI could always get a .270 or 06' and have it rebarreled one day to a .280.....hmmmm.....
Any other opinions would be greatly appreciated.
To reply to one of the previous post, I've always wanted a .280, but finding one in a left handed stainless/synthetic model is pretty hard unless I have it custom built.
I guessI could always get a .270 or 06' and have it rebarreled one day to a .280.....hmmmm.....
Any other opinions would be greatly appreciated.
#13
I'd go .280. although there is nothing wrong with 270. I like the older stuff my self........ 6.5x55mm, 7x 57, 257 roberts and so on
#15
Fork Horn
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
I have a 270 and a 7mm saum. It's pretty much the same as a 7mmr. On deer at leasts I have'nt seen any appreciable difference on deer between it and my 270. Plus the 270 is cheaper to shoot.
#16
im pretty bias top .35 calibers. i say .350 mag to everyting lol 180 gr barnes x. the way i see it, theres no debate about that caliber on anything. bang. flop. dead.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
santiagodm
Hunts/Outfitters
0
12-04-2007 07:43 PM




