RE: P&Y vs. B&Y
 

net scores are for basketball

RE: P&Y vs. B&Y
 

B & C will Honor deer that are 160 They are not a B&C record book buck unless they are 170

RE: P&Y vs. B&Y
 

I thought nets were for fishing Gross is for hunting

RE: P&Y vs. B&Y
 

Read the rest of the thread, this has been said many times.
160 is a B&C animal......170 is All time and goes in the book......but 160 is recognized as B&C.

RE: P&Y vs. B&Y
 

NETS are for FISHING!!!!!

Thats where I don't agree with scoring either. The scoring with deductions is stupid. Total horn growth should be what the deer is. We aren't tryin to produce horses or cattle hear where they get judged on how perfect they are...........WCL

RE: P&Y vs. B&Y
 

Haha you beat me to it, owell glad someone else feels the same. haha. WCL

RE: P&Y vs. B&Y
 

So, my tape measure in hand comrades... whats the difference between the aforementioned two and BTR scoring? I think I know, but I'll bite my tounge (or should it read fold my hands) for someone who knows for sure.

RE: P&Y vs. B&Y
 

I measured a buck yesterday that was a 6 x 5 with 2 kickers of an inch and 4 inches. Since the 6th point was all deduction and there was some uneven tine length this monster 188 gross scoring typical won't make book. It only netted about 165. What a shame.