![]() |
RE: SIGHTING IN
Does anyone know if changing your ammo, you would have to sight it in to the ammo? thats what my dad said but i dont know if he's just saying that because he doesnt want to change (he wants us both using the same ammo and i want to change from 130 grains to 150)
|
RE: SIGHTING IN
ORIGINAL: Riffer Does anyone know if changing your ammo, you would have to sight it in to the ammo? thats what my dad said but i dont know if he's just saying that because he doesnt want to change (he wants us both using the same ammo and i want to change from 130 grains to 150) |
RE: SIGHTING IN
As far as 180gr/300wsm for 200 yard zero +1.5" at 100 will get you close.
|
RE: SIGHTING IN
ORIGINAL: Riffer Does anyone know if changing your ammo, you would have to sight it in to the ammo? thats what my dad said but i dont know if he's just saying that because he doesnt want to change (he wants us both using the same ammo and i want to change from 130 grains to 150) |
RE: SIGHTING IN
ORIGINAL: Don Fischer Try the figures I gave you above, I'll bet they are awful close. With the figure's Winchester gave you, you have a 100 yd zero and50 fps more velocity, that won't make much difference over 300 yds. The price of that ammo, I sure hope you have a lot of money or are taking up reloading! 30-06 ammo cost's about 1/4 the price and kill's animals only a bit less dead. I hadn't realized that stuff cost that much! If you can find someone with a cronograph, you'll probally find out the vevocity Winchester gives is not quite right. To many different thing's effecting it. |
RE: SIGHTING IN
ORIGINAL: thegamehunter ORIGINAL: Don Fischer Try the figures I gave you above, I'll bet they are awful close. With the figure's Winchester gave you, you have a 100 yd zero and50 fps more velocity, that won't make much difference over 300 yds. The price of that ammo, I sure hope you have a lot of money or are taking up reloading! 30-06 ammo cost's about 1/4 the price and kill's animals only a bit less dead. I hadn't realized that stuff cost that much! If you can find someone with a cronograph, you'll probally find out the vevocity Winchester gives is not quite right. To many different thing's effecting it. I wouldn't reccomend the BT anything larger then deer, it just isn't built for reliable performance on heavier skinned/boned and muscle animals. For deer it will work fine though. In terms of the the Accubond; designed to retain 60% of its original mass. I have used it personally for deer, elk and moose, reccomended for such usage. The XP3 I have not used but based on what I have read it is designed to retain near 90% and is suitable for deer and elk usage. |
RE: SIGHTING IN
where do you get the software for finding out the trajectory and everything? can i get the same software?
|
RE: SIGHTING IN
Don Fisher,
I have a couple of questions; 1. How did you figure "max" point blank range? 2. Did you mean to say "zero" or does "point blank zero" actually mean something? As far as I know they are two different things. I'm not trying to be confrontational, just asking. KP |
RE: SIGHTING IN
ORIGINAL: huntboy3181 where do you get the software for finding out the trajectory and everything? can i get the same software? http://www.handloads.com/calc/ http://www.biggameinfo.com/ |
RE: SIGHTING IN
ORIGINAL: Killer_Primate Don Fisher, I have a couple of questions; 1. How did you figure "max" point blank range? 2. Did you mean to say "zero" or does "point blank zero" actually mean something? As far as I know they are two different things. I'm not trying to be confrontational, just asking. KP Zero is the point where the bullet pathand line of site intersect. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.