And I thought my .270 was a big deer gun
#32
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Posts: 689
RE: And I thought my .270 was a big deer gun
I think his stories are hilarious, I'm taking it as a fictional story though which makes it very funny in my book. If he actually did this, its not right and he should be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law.
#35
RE: And I thought my .270 was a big deer gun
The guys next web page will be detailed instructions with photoson how to dupe hundreds of overly gullible suckers on the internet.
we might just see someone we know on that page!!
we might just see someone we know on that page!!
#36
RE: And I thought my .270 was a big deer gun
i bet they would would really get a kick if there was an anonomis(sp?) tip set to the Wisconsin CPO about it.
That is pretty retarded i could see owning one of them thing to have fun and shot, Kinda wish i could) but to go out and do something like that is completly unethical and them people should be required to give up there hunting privalges and asked to give up there guns, That is completly uncalled for if u cant take a animal with a rifle or bow then u should not be hunting, and if u have to do something such as this to get your kicks will hunting u should not be hunting, They have clubs that u can join that u can go to meets and shoot cannons all day long.
That is pretty retarded i could see owning one of them thing to have fun and shot, Kinda wish i could) but to go out and do something like that is completly unethical and them people should be required to give up there hunting privalges and asked to give up there guns, That is completly uncalled for if u cant take a animal with a rifle or bow then u should not be hunting, and if u have to do something such as this to get your kicks will hunting u should not be hunting, They have clubs that u can join that u can go to meets and shoot cannons all day long.
#37
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 279
RE: And I thought my .270 was a big deer gun
Well I say that if it is legal then its up to him what he wants to do. Of course this is either a joke or a nutty but generally I like nutties. Maybe it is legaleven if it does not sounds like it? Can he ensure safety? If so, then it is kind of cool.
Ive seen deer hit messier than that. Large magnums are legal and this guy has a reallybig magnum. The deer shown did probably not suffer.
The running question is ifthe gunis accurate enough to ensure that the deer gets hit good. Giving the deer a fighting chancedoes not involve what happens after the trigger breaks. Thats just work.
Ive seen deer hit messier than that. Large magnums are legal and this guy has a reallybig magnum. The deer shown did probably not suffer.
The running question is ifthe gunis accurate enough to ensure that the deer gets hit good. Giving the deer a fighting chancedoes not involve what happens after the trigger breaks. Thats just work.
#38
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 249
RE: And I thought my .270 was a big deer gun
It would probably be legal if took the wheels off it, had a nice walnut monte carlo stock installed with a really really good shock resistance scope and a few nice slings. The scope is for looks only. Fire that thing you will need a proctologistto find your head from the recoil bending you backwards before your feet left the ground.