rediculas
#81
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glen Burnie, Maryland
Posts: 21
RE: rediculas
although many things have been said and done, and yes i agree some of the language and name calling was a bit overboard.
I have NEVER laughed so hard in my life. This thread was the funniest.
I just started hunting about 2 1/2 years ago. So i didn't have an ole timmer teaching me anything, so i don't have much choice in purchasing the "new fanguled" equipment. but you know what i like it. but i will say - everything i have is from WALMART.
Oh I wonder what he would have to say if he know if am a "girl" ewww.
I have NEVER laughed so hard in my life. This thread was the funniest.
I just started hunting about 2 1/2 years ago. So i didn't have an ole timmer teaching me anything, so i don't have much choice in purchasing the "new fanguled" equipment. but you know what i like it. but i will say - everything i have is from WALMART.
Oh I wonder what he would have to say if he know if am a "girl" ewww.
#83
RE: rediculas
DannyD:
Yes klburton, that is horrible. According to Grand Pappy's Home Guide Journal, you should be staying at home, pregnant at times, barefoot, cleaning the house (whether it needs it or not), cooking, etc.... LOL!
Seriously though, WELCOME TO THE FORUM.
By the way, do you happen to look anything like Tiffany Lakosky? If so - please post a picture?
I'm appalled.
Seriously though, WELCOME TO THE FORUM.
By the way, do you happen to look anything like Tiffany Lakosky? If so - please post a picture?
#84
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 494
RE: rediculas
Yes indeed, welcome to the new female hunter! Welcome both because you're new and because you're one of too few women who hunt.
RE: women hunting... Just a funny thing I ran across on the web a couple years back: I did a search looking for some blaze orange stuff and came across a web page for, I think, the Indiana DNR. It was a staff report or testimony at a public meeting or some such thing concerning blaze orange clothing. The point of the article was why not also allow flourescent pink clothing for safety because it is as visible (or maybe more so). The point was also made that because it was pink it might attract more women to hunting! I'd have to say the gals I know who like to hunt and fish (and hike and canoe and camp, etc. etc.) aren't exactly motivated by pink clothing. It's not that they don't like to look good, but they aren't "pink" type of women, in my experience. Just something funny I ran across.
RE: women hunting... Just a funny thing I ran across on the web a couple years back: I did a search looking for some blaze orange stuff and came across a web page for, I think, the Indiana DNR. It was a staff report or testimony at a public meeting or some such thing concerning blaze orange clothing. The point of the article was why not also allow flourescent pink clothing for safety because it is as visible (or maybe more so). The point was also made that because it was pink it might attract more women to hunting! I'd have to say the gals I know who like to hunt and fish (and hike and canoe and camp, etc. etc.) aren't exactly motivated by pink clothing. It's not that they don't like to look good, but they aren't "pink" type of women, in my experience. Just something funny I ran across.
#85
Fork Horn
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Park Ridge New Jersey USA
Posts: 177
RE: rediculas
I have resisted responding tosuch a pointless thread as this as of yet, but now I have had it. Can the adminstrators please have the person who started this thread thrown off the forum. I come onto this forum to get information, give information, hear good hunting stories, etc...., not to be insulted. I really don't think we need someone on our forum calling everyone on here "idiots", "retards", "dumb rednecks", and "fulltime losers". I also don't need to have someone passing constant judgement on everyones hunting methods, equipment choices, etc.