Which camera to choose? the difference in price doesn't concern me
07-23-2011 | 03:07 PM
#22
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,178
Likes: 0
From: Southeast Missouri
I have several Moultrie Camera's and the I-60 camera's I have work great...I'd get the Moultrie You mentioned and or the Cuddeback "Capture" Flash Camera...it has a much faster trigger speed and usually nothing will get by it without it taking a picture.
07-23-2011 | 08:07 PM
#23
Thread Starter
Fork Horn
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Yes I'm getting 2 cameras and they don't have to be the same. I'm thinking one with a quick trigger time for trails (the cuddeback) and maybe something with a good detection zone and quality picture for food sources (bushnell/moultrie)
07-24-2011 | 07:42 AM
#24
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,178
Likes: 0
From: Southeast Missouri
Thats a very good idea...picking 2 different Camera's to fit Your different needs and goals.I've heard good things about the Bushnell's and the Moultrie M-80X and M-100.I think my next new camera will be the M-100 since they are in Camo,and have 6.0 megapixels for better picture quality!
07-28-2011 | 09:27 PM
#26
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
From: York, PA.
Why not try a "homebrew" camera. Made with Sony cameras. Control boards made right here in the USA. Warrantied FOREVER. Every single unit is custom made to suit your needs such as battery life, detection distance, flash range and strength, ir, video or IR video. Too many options to list.
Last edited by J Pike; 07-28-2011 at 09:56 PM.
07-29-2011 | 09:36 PM
#28
Typical Buck
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
07-30-2011 | 09:17 AM
#30
Typical Buck
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
I bought a M80x at the local Runnings fleet farm for 120.00 on sale this morning but i really dont need them in camo. I just couldnt resist after seeing some of the great pics it takes.