SC-550(pictures added)
#12

The pictures seem to be consistent to me (trees are in the same spot every time), that would rule out tree sway,
It could be because of the brush, but i thought these cams were supposed to detect an infrared heat change i order to trip, not just movement,
The camera might be mounted at a bad angle...still shouldnt take blank pics
It could be because of the brush, but i thought these cams were supposed to detect an infrared heat change i order to trip, not just movement,
The camera might be mounted at a bad angle...still shouldnt take blank pics
#13

ORIGINAL: Siman08/OH
The pictures seem to be consistent to me (trees are in the same spot every time), that would rule out tree sway,
It could be because of the brush, but i thought these cams were supposed to detect an infrared heat change i order to trip, not just movement,
The camera might be mounted at a bad angle...still shouldnt take blank pics
The pictures seem to be consistent to me (trees are in the same spot every time), that would rule out tree sway,
It could be because of the brush, but i thought these cams were supposed to detect an infrared heat change i order to trip, not just movement,
The camera might be mounted at a bad angle...still shouldnt take blank pics
#17
Typical Buck
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 993

ORIGINAL: Siman08/OH
'
Well that seems pretty stupid
Windy days are not going to be fun for
this camera
ORIGINAL: Germ
If I would read the box, LOL
it has a motion trigger
If I would read the box, LOL
it has a motion trigger
Well that seems pretty stupid

this camera
Its really no different then alot of other cams out on the market.