Community
Trail Cameras Post your trail cam photos, reviews, tips, and suggestions here.

2008 Cuddebacks

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-23-2008 | 03:39 PM
  #1  
janesburg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default 2008 Cuddebacks

I just received this. Looks promising if you like Cuddebacks.




janesburg is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2008 | 04:43 PM
  #2  
gutshotem's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default RE: 2008 Cuddebacks

Finally, a cuddeback that i can afford. Was thinking of getting a Moultrie I-40, but I may have to reconsider.
gutshotem is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2008 | 06:13 PM
  #3  
Spike
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2008 Cuddebacks

looks like they went back to the old 35mm deer cam design

buckeater is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2008 | 08:26 PM
  #4  
Siman08/OH's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,834
Likes: 0
From: Chatham, Ohio
Default RE: 2008 Cuddebacks

uh oh....i might buy a cudde [:@]heavy hitter will never let me here the end of it
Siman08/OH is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2008 | 09:48 PM
  #5  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Chippewa Falls, WI
Default RE: 2008 Cuddebacks

Nice to see the prices coming down for 3MPixel camera. SD card is a plus.

Wish the form factor didn't change with each new generation. Now I'll have to invest in a whole new suite of Bear Safes.
W9AR is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-2008 | 09:40 AM
  #6  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2008 Cuddebacks

I will not get too excited yet with the new Cuddebacks. The last time they changed designsin 2006 it turned out to be a disaster. They took their proven 3.0 design, and ruined the battery holding compartment, andreduced battery life not to mention all the other problems.
Both my 2006 Experts that were the so called new improved design have been nothing but problems, and both been in for service multiple times.

Everyone I know that purchased their so called new improved design in 2006has had nothing but issues.

I will be curious to see the reviews on these cameras.

Cuddeback had no choice but to lower their prices. There are far better choices on the market today with much lower prices. Moultrie was simply kicking their butt in sales.
Right now the Moultrie I-40 is the best camera for the money on the market today. I am running 7 of them with not 1 issue.
archer125 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-2008 | 09:46 AM
  #7  
WVSPORTSMAN's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: Crab Orchard, WV
Default RE: 2008 Cuddebacks

i have i40's also, but i will buy one of these cuddes and see how they do.... they sound good...hope they work good! when will they be out?
WVSPORTSMAN is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-2008 | 09:54 AM
  #8  
Siman08/OH's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,834
Likes: 0
From: Chatham, Ohio
Default RE: 2008 Cuddebacks

ORIGINAL: buckeater

looks like they went back to the old 35mm deer cam design
and maybe they should....that was a dang good camera
Siman08/OH is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-2008 | 10:11 AM
  #9  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: illinois
Default RE: 2008 Cuddebacks

lower prices? now all you cheap bastards can't use that for an excuse anymore. hell, i may go buy another one. i'm not sure how the trigger could be twice as fast though.
heavy hitter is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-2008 | 10:29 AM
  #10  
Schultzy's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,445
Likes: 0
From: Central Minnesota
Default RE: 2008 Cuddebacks

Lmao!!
Schultzy is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.