Here's a peek at the deer I hunt
02-27-2008, 01:21 PM
#12
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 16
RE: Here's a peek at the deer I hunt
I agree with camocop. I just want to see whats moving through certain areas. If I wanted to frame them I would go to the Cades Cove 15 minutes up the road and take pictures of the monster deer there. If the pics are fuzzy or don't look like they belong in a calendar, its ok. I can see whats traveling through just as good as the one who goes and spends a few hundred at Bass Pro. To each their own
02-27-2008, 02:13 PM
#14
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 16
RE: Here's a peek at the deer I hunt
Probably not. While I don't study all the different makes and models of cams, the only 35mm trail cam I know of is the Stealth cam model. Last time I looked it cost more than the wildview digital I have. Along with the 35 mm, your only going to be able to take so many pictures before running out of film. Then you would have to develop the film, and buy new film to replace it. I would hate to go through all that trouble and wasted money only to see a squirrell hopping around and a crow wasting the film. The wildview (while still cheaper) will hold over 1,000 pictures because I have a 512mb card I won off ebay for 3.00 shipped.
02-28-2008, 10:43 AM
#15
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chatham, Ohio
Posts: 8,834
RE: Here's a peek at the deer I hunt
ORIGINAL: heavy hitter
i was asking cause the picture quality is horrible. i figured it was probably a moultrie, "the best camera for the money".
i was asking cause the picture quality is horrible. i figured it was probably a moultrie, "the best camera for the money".
02-28-2008, 09:32 PM
#17
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chatham, Ohio
Posts: 8,834
RE: Here's a peek at the deer I hunt
ORIGINAL: cbcs1987
Probably not. While I don't study all the different makes and models of cams, the only 35mm trail cam I know of is the Stealth cam model. Last time I looked it cost more than the wildview digital I have. Along with the 35 mm, your only going to be able to take so many pictures before running out of film. Then you would have to develop the film, and buy new film to replace it. I would hate to go through all that trouble and wasted money only to see a squirrell hopping around and a crow wasting the film. The wildview (while still cheaper) will hold over 1,000 pictures because I have a 512mb card I won off ebay for 3.00 shipped.
Probably not. While I don't study all the different makes and models of cams, the only 35mm trail cam I know of is the Stealth cam model. Last time I looked it cost more than the wildview digital I have. Along with the 35 mm, your only going to be able to take so many pictures before running out of film. Then you would have to develop the film, and buy new film to replace it. I would hate to go through all that trouble and wasted money only to see a squirrell hopping around and a crow wasting the film. The wildview (while still cheaper) will hold over 1,000 pictures because I have a 512mb card I won off ebay for 3.00 shipped.
02-29-2008, 07:10 PM
#18
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 510
RE: Here's a peek at the deer I hunt
ORIGINAL: heavy hitter
i was asking cause the picture quality is horrible. i figured it was probably a moultrie, "the best camera for the money".
i was asking cause the picture quality is horrible. i figured it was probably a moultrie, "the best camera for the money".
02-29-2008, 08:22 PM
#19
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chatham, Ohio
Posts: 8,834
RE: Here's a peek at the deer I hunt
ORIGINAL: matters
Are we photographers or hunters? This kind of comment gives me the $#*!. Give me a break. If you got the money buy your stinking cuddle. For the rest of us leave us alone we are happy with our photos we can tell what we got in the area if you can't. I could care less how pretty your pictures are but the question is are you skilled enough to kill it?
ORIGINAL: heavy hitter
i was asking cause the picture quality is horrible. i figured it was probably a moultrie, "the best camera for the money".
i was asking cause the picture quality is horrible. i figured it was probably a moultrie, "the best camera for the money".
