moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
 

Ok guys and gals lets see your average quality pic from the moultrie D-40. I have a few 3.1's but have never tried a D-40. For you guys that have tried them both, what are the overall differences in photo quality and trigger speed?

RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
 

picture quality isn't good for either, and unless you set it over a bait pile you won't get pictures cause it triggers sooooo slow. customer service is excellent though.

RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
 

I have the Moultrie D40, and I love it so far. Batteries could last longer, but other than that, for the $$, it is a great camera. The only other camera I have had is a 35mm Stealth. I will post some pics from it tonight when I get home from work. Like someone told me before, every camera has its good points, and bad points, but the bottom line is, buy what you can afford, and hae fun with it. I for one, refuse to go out and spend $300 on a camera that is going to be outside on a tree all the time.

RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
 

I agree. I also have a D40 and it does the job. I don't need a fancy camera for what I use it for.

RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
 

why don't you just change your name from heavy hitter to "iminlovewithcuddebacksandeverythingelseiscrap "

RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
 

cuddes are horrible. moultries are the greatest cameras ever made. the picture quality is incredible and the batteries will last for years. heck i've taken 10,000 pictures with my d40 and the battery life still says 85%. plus, their customer service is second to none.

RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
 

Here are some picture from the D-40.

RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
 

That's better...:D

RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
 

haha i love yanking your chain heavy hitter, i just gotta get some nice pics with my stealth so i can compete with your "amazingness" ;)

RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
 

kiss my....