[Deleted]
#2
Boone & Crockett
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,295
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi USA
The Hunter II has a more deflexed riser, which is, in general, a little more forgiving, but gives up a little bit of speed to a straighter riser. I like the feel Hunter II a little better than the Hunter I.
Chad
Chad
#3
Speed difference? Very minimal. I have a Hunter & a Hunter II, both 62". The Hunter is 3# less in draw weight and shoots the same arrows at the exact same speed as my Hunter II.
I bought the Hunter as a back-up for the Hunter II. After shooting them both I'll probably sell the Hunter and buy a second Hunter II. I like the deflexed riser MUCH better.
JRW
I bought the Hunter as a back-up for the Hunter II. After shooting them both I'll probably sell the Hunter and buy a second Hunter II. I like the deflexed riser MUCH better.
JRW
#4
Typical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
From: California
Seems I read someplace that the bowyer who builds the Chek-Mates prefers the hunter II as well.
I'll take a more stable and forgiving bow over a little more speed everytime.
I'll take a more stable and forgiving bow over a little more speed everytime.




