Community
Technical Find or ask for all the information on setting up, tuning, and shooting your bow. If it's the technical side of archery, you'll find it here.

Broadhead Selection and Kinetic Energy

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-04-2002 | 07:05 AM
  #11  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore Maryland USA
Default RE: Broadhead Selection and Kinetic Energy

My shop is NOT the one in Baltimore that would recommend mechanicals for such a piece of equipment/set-up. I go along with everyone except Todd1700 on this one.

Len in Maryland is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2002 | 07:44 AM
  #12  
Rob/PA Bowyer's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 18,322
Likes: 0
From: Hughesville, PA USA
Default RE: Broadhead Selection and Kinetic Energy

LEN, those of us who know you here know it wasn't your shop. <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>

And I concur with the above, especially Matt/PA. With your marginal setup use a fixed blade head.



<font color=blue>Good Luck and Good Shooting</font id=blue>

<font color=red>Rob</font id=red>
Rob/PA Bowyer is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2002 | 08:44 AM
  #13  
ijimmy's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: WEST PALM FLORIDA
Default RE: Broadhead Selection and Kinetic Energy

Nothing wrong with 100 grain magnus or steel fource either I think you would have good sucess with these choices

If information provided by the members of this board have helped you please let us know .
ijimmy is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2002 | 01:35 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore Md USA
Default RE: Broadhead Selection and Kinetic Energy

Thanks for the wonderful feedback. I should however clarify some things. Apparently The Jak-Hammer comes in a couple varieties. The one I purchased is the JAK-HAMMER SELECT-A-CUT (100 gr.) which can be set at 1-1/2&quot; OR 1-3/4&quot;. I set them at 1-1/2&quot; fearing that lack of KE may become an issue. I didn't mean to be misleading, I was just uninformed as this was my first mechanical purchase. I opted for the 100gr. broadheads to match the weight of the my field points. Sorry for the confusion.

Also, the broadheads weren't purchased from Len's shop nor from any shop in Baltimore. Len, I wasn't trying to implicate you in offering bad advice or selling me a product that was ill-suited to humanely harvest a deer and if I somehow inadvertently implied so, I sincerely apologize. My purpose is gathering good information so I don't just wound a deer. I'm quite sure we can all agree that that would be the WORST thing that could happen. Maybe if I'd have asked my dealer better questions I would have got a product more suited to my needs. Ask better questions, get better answers, huh?

That being said, and now knowing that the cutting diameter is set at 1-1/2&quot; instead of 1-3/4&quot;, does this change anyone's opinion or am I still on the marginal end?

Thanks,

Don

ps. I've found this forum to be a wealth of information and would like to personally thank all respondents. I try to visit at least once daily and look forward to it greatly.

mdhunter2 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2002 | 03:39 PM
  #15  
Matt / PA's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,497
Likes: 0
From: Dover, PA USA
Default RE: Broadhead Selection and Kinetic Energy

Don,
There really isn't much of a difference between the 2 lengths from what I've seen as far as KE requirements.......I'm afraid you are still way lower than what I would consider safe for that size cut, and even that STYLE (swing open) for that matter.
I'd even be leary of you using the small diameter Rocket Steelhead, or even the Snyper.

1 1/2&quot; is still a large diameter mechanical and I would lump it in the same category as the 1 3/4&quot; version......it takes some whoop to get these heads open and keep that surface area moving thru the target,and you truly don't have enough to do both.

Personally I wouldn't let someone out the door with your set-up and those heads if they were hunting with me.......that's how little faith I would have in their effectiveness on every shot.
Frankly I wouldn't even put you in the &quot;Marginal&quot; end for that particular head, you are (IMO) BELOW marginal for ANY mechanical head.......you'll be MUCH better served with a quality fixed head.

Welcome to the board and we'll look forward to having you around!


Matt / PA is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2002 | 04:09 PM
  #16  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Bloomington MN USA
Default RE: Broadhead Selection and Kinetic Energy

I had penetration problems using the wasp jack-hammers and will never use them again. I'm shooting somewhere around 60 ft-lbs. I think you'd be fine with the steelheads though...
dwcp99 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2002 | 07:40 PM
  #17  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore Md USA
Default RE: Broadhead Selection and Kinetic Energy

Ok then, fixed it is. I won't risk injuring a deer if I can at all avoid it. Humane kill or nothing. Doing something like that knowing ahead of time that it was avoidable is inexcusable and makes us look bad (or even worse to the anti's).

How 'bout a recommendation on a low profile fixed BH? As I stated earlier I used to use the Thunderhead 125 and I know they make a 100 grain model. Are they ok or do they have something out even better?

Thanks.
mdhunter2 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2002 | 08:59 PM
  #18  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
From: Pine Hill Alabama USA
Default RE: Broadhead Selection and Kinetic Energy

Len what do you disagree with that I said.
Todd1700 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2002 | 09:02 PM
  #19  
Rob/PA Bowyer's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 18,322
Likes: 0
From: Hughesville, PA USA
Default RE: Broadhead Selection and Kinetic Energy

Mdhunter, you just showed alot of character and earned alot of respect from this bowyer.

There are plenty of great fixed blade heads on the market today, just a short list you won't have any problem with are the Muzzy, (any size), InnerLoc, Wasp SST's, Rocky Mountain Premiers, Thunderheads, 125 or 100,

Perhaps with your arrow selection, the 100 grain line will fit your needs. I recommend 100 grain Muzzy's, but all of those mentioned will do great.

Great post too.

<font color=blue>Good Luck and Good Shooting</font id=blue>

<font color=red>Rob</font id=red>
Rob/PA Bowyer is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2002 | 10:33 PM
  #20  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Sheboygan WI USA
Default RE: Broadhead Selection and Kinetic Energy

Dollar for dollar, you can't match a Muzzy....but for a bit more money, I'd look at the slick tricks, and G5 Montecs.
Stealth_Force is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.