![]() |
RE: Snyper report....NOT GOOD!!!
Your correct , I didn't mention it because I figured it as being the obvious.
|
RE: Snyper report....NOT GOOD!!!
Regarding titanium snypers. I e-mailed them a few weeks back, asking if they had ever considered coming out with a titanium snyper at 75 grains (don't ask), and their response was that titanium was actually heavier than aluminum, so the weight would increase. This leads me to believe that the Snyper ferrule must be made of aluminum, and at the present design is at it's minimum possible weight of 100 grains.
I'm no metalurgist, but I highly suspect aluminum has nowhere near the shear strength of steel or titanium. Perhaps this is the problem with the weak spot suggested in this thread? |
RE: Snyper report....NOT GOOD!!!
Titanium 3 blade 1.5" 125gr snyper=Perfection. How come nobody ever listens to me. ;)
"In heaven, even the fish have antlers" |
RE: Snyper report....NOT GOOD!!!
I think we are alll missing the point here.
NOBODY has any business shooting any mechanical at Elk size game or larger. If you cannot shoot fixed blades or cut to tip broadheads stick to deer and smaller critters. Tune your bow and your fixed blades will fly every bit as accuarate as mechanicals. All mechanicals are good for is people who do not want to tune their bow PERFECT so they buy mechanicals and call it good enough. |
RE: Snyper report....NOT GOOD!!!
Coorey oo6
I will bet that my bow is tuned much better than yours and I CHOOSE to use them because they fly better than any fixed head,period.They also penetrate better than most fixed heads,excluding a 2 blader and they fly like crap at higher speeds on carbons.As a matter of fact I just tried shooting a fixed out of my bow at 30 yards and with 3" vanes.My bow is tuned well enough to shoot them accurately at 30 yards,even with 3" vanes.Now if there was a 20 mph cross wind and I had a 40 yard shot,I don't think they would do as well.I would be confident with my Rockets. I would choose a Steelhead on elk and not be afraid of penetration at all.I would be more confident in them on an elk than a Muzzy(and I like muzzy's).The only way I would choose a fixed for elk is if the place I hunted wouldn't allow them. Edited by - tfox on 09/09/2002 19:41:10 |
RE: Snyper report....NOT GOOD!!!
Heres a reply from a broadhead company to my question. My question shows up first.....
Hi I am confused by all the different stories about expandables. I am spending a lot of money to go on an elk hunt and want to have no trouble with killing. As a manufacturer please enlighten me on your recommendation. I dont want to make judgement from stories on the web because they rarely say what they are using for a bow, or KE abilities. I am sure you have done some research on the capabilities of elk killing with your hrads so please tell me what you think and have found. I shoot a Mathews MQ1 with 390 grain head/shaft combo arrows. I shoot at 72lbs at a speed of 285fps for a KE of about 70lb. The arrow is pretty light so i am worried about momentum and long range shots. I plan on using a mechanicle because last year i used a small diameter fixed blade and had very little to no blood trail on a huge bull and never found it. Please advise on what broadhead is your recommendation from your research and field results. I want a good penetrating head, with good blood. are expandables for me, or just something to worry about Thank you, Schmalts His reply... First, The Spitfire is a friction fit broadhead that has some very unique properties. Spitfires open every time regardless of angle but can also close either by suddenly stopping the arrow, by clamping pressure inside the animal or by having the blades pivot forward as the arrow backed out. By using retention clips instead of rubber bands Spitfires have the potential of resetting the blades. If you would like to see this for yourself try this experiment. Find a foam target that you can shoot through, but one that will also stop the arrow somewhere along the shaft so that the point of the arrow protrudes the back side but the fletches are still on the front side. Tape a piece of paper on the BACK of the target and then shoot an arrow. You will find the Spitfire closed, but the paper will indicate that it was completely opened as it passed through the target. Reliability is always a concern. Like all things there are nay sayers that claim that mechanicals will not open. Mechanical heads in general have both pros and cons. The Spitfire is the straightest ((0.002) of all broadheads (fixed, replaceable or mechanical) on the market today and is a very good choice for use on just about any game so long as attention is paid to the conditions surrounding the hunt. The ShockWave is almost as straight ((0.003) and has the added consideration of a more wallet friendly price point. The straightness is a contributing factor to the accuracy of the head which when combined with an aerodynamic ferrule and blade design make both broadheads ultimately easier to group and tune than a standard Thunderhead. In fact Spitfires shot from a shooting machine at 60 yards will hit the exact hole as a field point (I have not yet performed this test at 60 yards with ShockWaves only out to 40 yards so far). Reliability is always a question. Like all things there are nay sayers that claim that mechanicals will not open. While I cannot speak for other brands, I have done extensive simulations and testing to determine which conditions could prevent the Spitfire/ ShockWave from opening and have not found any which prevent the blades from opening. I have even frozen the broadheads in water in one case and dried the heads in mud in another. In both cases they opened. One advantage of the Spitfire is cutting diameter. The ShockWave is 1.25 cutting diameter the Spitfire is 1.5. Considering the average deer chest cavity is 18 inches wide, the ShockWave would cut 22.5 inches of tissue on a broadside pass through while the Spitfire would cut 27 inches on the same shot. Bowhunting relies on hemorrhage to bring the animal down. The Spitfire provides a 20% greater chance to cut blood vessels than the ShockWave and 24% greater chance than a Thunderhead. Spitfire along with Thunderhead blades are the sharpest in the industry. Our Diamizing process take blade sharpness to the ultimate edge with an ultra polish that perfects the edge. On a separate note, few people realize that broadhead penetration has very little to do with broadheads. Rather, penetration has almost everything to do with arrow flight. A well tuned 50 pound bow with arrows that fly without wobble penetrates better than an 80 pound bow with aberrant arrow flight. Probably the greatest disadvantage of Spitfires or mechanicals in general is that as a group they tend to be much more critical of arrow spine than replaceable or fixed bladed broadheads. Because there is a loss of energy of about 1 to 3 ft/lbs. when a Spitfire contacts a target, and because this energy loss is directly opposite the direction of travel, an improperly spined arrow will have an additive effect. Generally an improperly spined arrow fails to penetrate well regardless of broadhead style because the energy is partially lost in some direction other than straight forward when the arrow strikes an animal. A standard broadhead in this scenario would most likely penetrate and stick in the animal with enough of the shaft inside to lodge it until the animal does something that causes the shaft to break or possibly get pulled out during escape. Spitfires along with most other mechanicals will almost instantly back out because of the additive effect of the spine related energy loss, reverse energy of opening the blades and the fact the blades can close easily preventing any anchoring effect. Our records indicate that 86% of all customers that have had bad luck with mechanicals are using an improperly spined arrow for their hunting adventures. Arrow flight is especially important on high angle shots. If the arrow is wobbling back and forth or up and down, then when it hits the target/animal the energy continues to the side rather than straight forward. On a mechanical this would have the effect of pivoting the broadhead and reducing penetration. Keep in mind that if your arrow flight is good then increased angle has NO effect. Another thing to consider is momentum. Momentum is often disregarded in archery because people tend to concentrate on kinetic energy. Let me explain the difference. Kinetic energy is the impact energy of the projectile. It is a very good way to determine how efficient your bow transfers stored energy in the limbs to dynamic energy in the arrow. For the most part kinetic energy in the 50 ft/lbs. to 60 ft/lbs. range is ample for taking animals in the deer to elk range. Kinetic energy in the 60 ft/lbs. to 70 ft/lbs. will effectively take any animal in North America. For example, Chuck Adams took his 1400 pound Kodiak Grizzly Bear with about 65 ft/lbs. of kinetic energy. I believe he used an arrow in the 630 grain range that traveled about 220 fps. While there are several arrow/speed combinations that would produce 65 ft/lbs. of kinetic energy, Chuck opted for a heavier slower arrow because of the momentum. Momentum is the ability of the projectile to continue in motion. Momentum is a linear function of mass. The idea is the greater the mass the more resistance is required to slow or stop the object. Think of it this way if someone were to pitch a baseball and a bowling ball to a batter, and both balls had the identical amount of kinetic energy even though one is traveling very fast and the other is traveling very slow. The batter would be able to hit the baseball and move it in the opposite direction very easily while the bowling ball would most likely break the bat. The bowling ball has tremendously greater momentum and therefore is much more difficult to stop or slow down. I'm including the equation to calculate your kinetic energy. My suggestion is this. Go to an archery shop that has a chronograph and a supply of arrows that weigh from 350 to 550 grains. Shoot these arrows through the chronograph to determine the speed. Then calculate the kinetic energy for each speed/weight combination. This will also allow you to hear the noise associated with each arrow. Then choose an arrow based on the game you intend to hunt. Faster, lighter arrows work well for deer sized animals. Medium-fast, mid-weight arrows work well for large deer to elk sized animals. Slower heavier arrows work well for elk and larger. Also, ask your archery shop what they would suggest for your specific hunting niche. I personally have light-weight arrows (320 grains) for 3 D tournaments, Slightly heavier arrows (420 grains) for deer and moderately heavy arrows (535 grains) for elk. To calculate the kinetic energy of your bow use the following equation: (Arrow Weight in Grains)(Velocity)2 = Ft/Lbs. 450240 Spitfires have been used to take all sorts of North American game including caribou, elk, moose and even kodiak brown bears. The performance of the Spitfire and penetration results exceed any other broadhead in the same class. As far as we can tell the heads open every time and they are the fastest opening mechanical on the market (0.0008 seconds). However, because of the retention clips they also close when stopped suddenly. This is because the direction of the blades reverses as the arrow stops, and as the blades swing forward there is sufficient energy to close the blades back into the slots. The retention clips then hold the blades in place in the closed position. Additionally, retention clips use less energy than rubber band or o-ring systems. ShockWaves incorporate an o-ring/guillotine system, which efficiently holds the blades shut but allows the blades to easily slice through the o-ring with minimal energy expenditure. ShockWaves are relatively new but have already proved themselves in the bowhunting world on animals as large as moose and bison. From the results we've seen so far we believe a lot of animals will fall when faced off against ShockWaves in the woods. I would hesitate to recommend any broadhead prior to knowing that your bow is tuned and that your arrows are flying well. However, if you feel that your set up is working well, then I don't think you would have any trouble with either Spitfires or ShockWaves. From the results we have seen in the past during our own hunts and the high number of letters and calls supporting Spitfires, our confidence is 100% that they will perform well in any circumstance. If you have any other questions please don't hesitate to call me at 800-323-1279. Thanks for contacting us regarding mechanical broadheads. Cary J. Pickands Technical Support Specialist New Archery Products, Corp. Edited by - schmalts on 09/09/2002 21:09:36 |
RE: Snyper report....NOT GOOD!!!
Cory006, I think YOU are missing the point. YOU don't have ANY business telling the rest of us what business WE have shooting Elk or bigger with a mech head. Hmmmmmmm for that matter, I guess I have no business telling you that...but it needed to be said.
I tune my bow PERFECTLY. YES, I get my Muzzy's to hit the same place as field points, but........tests have shown many mech heads to penetrate AS WELL or sometimes BETTER than ANY other head. I know YOU DON'T want to hear that, but it is TRUE! Get over it. As posted on the Rocket web page (you can choose to concider the source) The current World record was shot with a mech head! And if I'm not mistaken, it was with a Wolverine 3 (all of 57 grains!). schmalts, excellent info in that post. Of course one again should consider the source, as MOST tests I have seen show the spitfire to be one of the slower opening heads. But the rest of the info was good. I won't go into the heavy vs. light, KE vs momentum vs velocity debate again (well....unless someone REALLY wants to start THAT again) But I will say that there are more than 1 ways to skin a cat (or shoot an elk) Light and fast seems to work JUST as well (ask that record holder) as heavy and slow. Purely a personal preferance. BOTH WILL work. |
RE: Snyper report....NOT GOOD!!!
Stealth Force and Tfox,
You can use whatever broadhead you want but IMHO mechanicals are better suited to deer sized game. I doubt very much that ANY mechanical head is going to out penetrate a 2 blade cut to tip broadhead. I would take that bet anyday. I tested the Rocket Steelhead against Wasp Hammmer and Gametracker First Cut and guess what?? The First Cut won followed by the Wasp and then came the Steelhead(the blades do NOT open on impact rather they opened when they are a inch into the target) and it did not penetrate as far as either the fixed blade Wasp or the Cut to tip First Cut. If you do not believe me buy some and test for yourself. DO NOT believe any advertisement in ANY magazine because they all say the same thing "the world's best Broadhead" or " the world's sharpest" or "the best penetrating head in the world". As far as using a mechanical on Elk you probably will be fine if u have 65 lbs KE or greater. I guess it is a matter of personal preference. I myself was thinking of using the Steelhead on an upcoming Moose hunt but decided to go with the Gametracker First Cut because I want to make sure I get MAXIMUM pentration. What happens with a mechanical head when it doesn't acheive a pass through and the animal doesn't leave much of a blood trail(because 99% of mech are not fully opened on impact). I would really hate spending all year getting ready for a hunt and at the moment of truth make a good shot and have a mehanical head fail and RUIN my whole year.... Good Luck to everyone this year regardless of what head you choose to adorn the tip of your arrow!!! |
RE: Snyper report....NOT GOOD!!!
I agree Corey006 that the Steelhead will not out penetrate a 2 blader,nothing will.2 bladers are not the best choice in the accuracy or toughness department either.There are some extremely heavy ones that are extremely tough but take an extremely heavy arrow to keep foc acceptable.A normal weight 2 blader is usually very thin on the end and can curl when hitting bone.
There are drawbacks with every head.Use what you are comfortable with. Oh yeah,you are right about adds but my info is not from adds but independant testing.Also the Rockets are guaranteed to be the best penetrating.If you don't agree then get your money back.It is that simple. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.