Have you seen this?
#1
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From:
#4
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From:
Nah, it' s the right thingy... 
Due to the title of the post, I figured some people wouldn' t look/re-look, and I was hoping to draw folks into the discussion on FOC and differing impact points, match point use, etc, etc...
Plus I' m bored and grasping at straws...
I hate slow board days!

Due to the title of the post, I figured some people wouldn' t look/re-look, and I was hoping to draw folks into the discussion on FOC and differing impact points, match point use, etc, etc...
Plus I' m bored and grasping at straws...

I hate slow board days!
#5
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: East Yapank NY USA
O.K., O.K. - I see now.....tricky
IMO the FOC change between bh and fp is so small it does not play a large part in poorly flying heads.
These " short" head designs also have shorter blades with less surface area. I think this is the major role in how well they can fly.
But......I have been wrong brfore

IMO the FOC change between bh and fp is so small it does not play a large part in poorly flying heads.
These " short" head designs also have shorter blades with less surface area. I think this is the major role in how well they can fly.
But......I have been wrong brfore




