After shooting with a peep for about 1.5 years. I had a new string put on my bow and told them to not put the peep on(they gasped when I said not to). I actually like the kisser better and was thinking if maybe a hind sight or no-peep. What are your thoughts? Thanks

go with the no-peep

hindsight

NO-PEEP!!

Nothing......I' ve found that my accuracy changes very little if I have two reference points at anchor (i.e. nose on string kisser at the corner of my mouth...)

I DID give up the Peep.... 3 yrs ago.

Changed it out for a No-peep, and never looked back.

I' ve seen the hindsight, looks OK too. I got the No-peep because I want a cleaner, brighter sight picture. IMO, the hindsight does the job it' s intended to, but with the downfall of adding more clutter to the sight window.

The way my No-peeps set up, it falls in line with the bottom of my sight block (Trophy Ridge) and becomes part of that image. Nothing but target and sight pins when sighting....

Either/or one of the two would work; personal choice from here on out....

Jim.

I go with what jcrayford2001 said,I have the no-peep also and imo it works great nothing to block your sights or your view, my buddy uses the hind sight and he likes it.The thing i don' t like about the hind sight is you still have to look through it sort of like a peep.

i shot with a peep for one year but then the thing has a tendency to roll out .I got rid of it for i kisser and i don' t know why any one would use a peep?I can shoot better with out the string clutter and vision killer! low light and roll out.

I' d go for the no-peep. It' s a great training device, and it' s use is not required to make a good shot. I like the fact that once it' s set, it' s permanent. If you change your sight or put on a new sight, you don' t have to touch the no-peep.

Two " kisser buttons."

One at the corner of the lip, one at the side of the nose = consistent anchor and nothing in front of sighting eye to sight-pin. Both eyes open for maximum vision and depth perception.