Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Technical
 Is spine really that important? (pics) >

Is spine really that important? (pics)

Community
Technical Find or ask for all the information on setting up, tuning, and shooting your bow. If it's the technical side of archery, you'll find it here.

Is spine really that important? (pics)

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-18-2006, 12:55 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,293
Default Is spine really that important? (pics)

There have been several questions about tuning and spine recently. There always are really, but it's getting close to the season openers so people are shooting more I think.

I was out today bare shaft tuning my bow with some new arrows. Since everyone is always asking about spine and how to bare shaft tune or broad head tune I thought I would share my experiences on the subject and show you a little test I did.



This is a picture of some groups I shot today. The yellow fletched arrows are 27 inch 2213 arrows with 100 grn tips and blazer 2" vanes. According to my OnTarget program these spine perfect at 53-54 lbs for my bow. I actually had to increase my draw weight to get them perfect though. I guess I'm going to have to calibrate the program to my set up. It was pretty close though. It showed them being slightly stiff for 53 lbs and slightly weak for 60 lbs.

The Orange nock feather fletched arrows are the same shafts and tips cut to 24 inches (I have a 26 inch draw length). The 27 inch arrows were shot at 30 yards, two fletched, one bare shaft (middle one). The 24 inch arrows were shot at 20 yards. I didn't trust bare shafting them at 30 yards.

As you can see the correct spine really pays off. I am normally one to suggest a stiffer spine arrow, however this goes to show that too stiff isn't always that great either. I will add that I have gotten severely stiff arrows to bare shaft and shoot broad heads well. It depends on the arrow, type of fletch and amount of FOC. And the broad head I guess.

I shot Arrow Dynamics Nitro Stingers for a while and they spined up to 100 lbs. I was shooting them out of a 50 lb bow at 24 inches with 85 grn tips. They flew well enough that I cut an arrow in half at 30 yards when broad head tuning. Don't shoot your field tipped arrows first, it gets expensive. If all I did was hunt these would be my arrows of choice hands down.

Here is another pic of some groups I shot last year.



The red vaned arrows are 25 inch 2213's with 100 grn tips, but I put a length of 2016 shaft inside them (fits perfect) to get the weight up to 450 grns. I don't have a clue what they spine, but they bare shafted well for me. The feather fletched purple arrows are 24 or 23 inch easton jazz 1816's with 80 grain glue in target points (no inserts). I would say the 2213 were a bit stiff and the 1816's were way weak. I also don't remember what distance this was, probably 20 or 30 yards.

They grouped well, but as you can see the impact points shifted from one spine to the other. I bet if I would have tried to bare shaft the lighter arrows it wouldn't even have hit the target. And I sure wouldn't want to shoot a broad head on one! I will note that I got the 1816's to paper tune and shoot bullet holes out of this set up. That is why I feel paper tuning is good for checking your initial nock point and centershot. Beyond that though I don't have much use for it to be honest. It is also a good way to check your grip. If you torque the bow a lot it will show up when you paper tune.

In both these pics I was shooting at the same spot for both groups in order to show the difference in impact points and grouping. I did a simular test a month or so ago at 70 yards but lost the picture. At that distance the better spine and bow tune made a large difference in groups.

I feel you would see simular results either with bare shafts or broad heads. Not exact, but the differences would be evident in one form or another.

My tuning session today shows why I normally base my new set ups on the mid draw weight range of a bow. And why I try to shoot a bow at the middle or lower draw weight range. When using a new set up it gives some leeway to play with the draw weight of your bow to match the spine better. I may switch to a heavier tip, or next time I get arrows cut them an inch or so longer so I can drop my weight back down.

I hope this helps someone.

Paul
Paul L Mohr is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 01:22 PM
  #2  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northeast Tennessee
Posts: 5,673
Default RE: Is spine really that important? (pics)

in the first picture, the arrows that arent grouped, the one on the very left is bent
Matt/TN is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 01:52 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,293
Default RE: Is spine really that important? (pics)

No it's not. Might be an optical illusion with the picture or something. I actually don't see it. I can assure you my arrows are not bent, certainly not to the degree you can see them with the naked eye.

I was shooting those same arrows a few weeks ago at 70 yards and they were grouping ok. Bent arrows won't do that.

Paul
Paul L Mohr is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 08:34 PM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
Bulzeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Too close to Chicago
Posts: 3,337
Default RE: Is spine really that important? (pics)

Great post Paul !

A picture is worth a thousand words, and since that's about how many words it takes to explain some of this stuff (weekly I might add), this shows the difference in reaction of arrows with different stiffnesses.

As close as 30 yards, there can be several inches difference in POI with only small variations like 25 grains of point weight, an inch or two of arrow length, or a 1/2 turn of the limb bolts. Bare shaft tuning really lets you see the difference so you can get things flying well.

-Bulz
Bulzeye is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 09:04 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,293
Default RE: Is spine really that important? (pics)

Too bad I posted the pics and a thousand words.


Paul
Paul L Mohr is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 09:16 PM
  #6  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northeast Tennessee
Posts: 5,673
Default RE: Is spine really that important? (pics)

i swear it looks bent
Matt/TN is offline  
Old 08-18-2006, 09:36 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,293
Default RE: Is spine really that important? (pics)

Put them on an arrow spinner just for you, straighter than some brand new carbons I have seen. It's probably an optical illusion because the bag target is curved. Digital camera's add weird effects to straight objects sometimes as well.

And I work at the back of a braze furnace straightening 30 inch long 5/8" dia steel tubes all day on a spinner simular to what you use for arrows. 1,000 to 1500 hot tubes a day. I know bent when I see it.

Paul
Paul L Mohr is offline  
Old 08-19-2006, 02:59 PM
  #8  
 
ash2042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 1,512
Default RE: Is spine really that important? (pics)

Cougar, I can see what you are talking about, the last few inches looks to bend to the right. I think it has to do with the helical on the feathers causing the illusion.
ash2042 is offline  
Old 08-19-2006, 08:37 PM
  #9  
 
Finch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 3,562
Default RE: Is spine really that important? (pics)

How come we always aim for the middle dot????[&:]

Good post Paul. I have the OnTarget Demo and I'm kinda intimidated by it.
Finch is offline  
Old 08-19-2006, 08:42 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,293
Default RE: Is spine really that important? (pics)

Because sometimes if we aim for the outer dots we are afraid of missing the target.

It's actually a subconcious thing for your brain to naturaly center things. You are right though, it's a bad habbit to get into.


Paul
Paul L Mohr is offline  


Quick Reply: Is spine really that important? (pics)


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.