![]() |
Scope arrived..It's wonderful and I can see CLEAR for a long ways..before mounting I'm going to the local gunstore and getting better mounts but in..then to a friends house to lazer sight it in and then to the range..
Summary...best scope I've ever looked through..cystal clear |
Yeah, you got a great scope. Way better choice to spend a little bit on a quality scope like that rather than going with a cheap $50-80 scope.
|
Originally Posted by bigbulls
(Post 3634307)
It's just their name for a standard duplex reticle.
Today's good glass is light years better than excellent glass of 20 or 30 years ago. There's a lot more to it than that. Glass is still being ground down like the way it was 50 years ago. Yield is a big factor, and lots of new methods for determining quality of the shape cut. Lots of new test gear out there to map the shape. But the trick is matching the index of refaction of the air to your eye under any circumstances, from dry air, to humid and over a huge temp range. Lots of new coatings also enhance parts of the visible spectrum at twilight like the conquest line. Those guys really have thier technique down. So does leupold with the VX3 line and Mark4 line is just plain awesome. Our one setup that coats is a 5mil investment. Once setup, your just recouping R&D cost. Back reflection is your enemy, and coatings help there and is directly coorelated to index matching. I myself will not buy anything of lesser quality than a conquest, monarch, or VX3 or Vari-X III, or 4200. The 4200 is ok, but not as durable as a Leupold fixed 4. My 460Smith destroys 4200's. My wants are Mark4's, but can't afford too many of those. |
Originally Posted by SWThomas
(Post 3633450)
Nikon ProStaff are great cheap scopes. I prefer Nikon Monarch because they're higher quality glass but they're more expensive.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:50 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.