More than one sweet spot??
#11
RE: More than one sweet spot??
Possibly.
It's your rifles and your body attached to them so do as you see fit.
It's your rifles and your body attached to them so do as you see fit.
#12
RE: More than one sweet spot??
I'm just puting up information guys. Don't get all ruffled up.
Not everyone that visits these forums is as knowledgable about reloading as others here. And I certainly don't claim to be a reloading guru. I've only been doing it a very short time off and on.
Joe Blow could come here and see that people are using 18 grains of powder in a 270 for reduced loads and think ..... if he can do it so can I ...... and then BOOM.
Not everyone that visits these forums is as knowledgable about reloading as others here. And I certainly don't claim to be a reloading guru. I've only been doing it a very short time off and on.
Joe Blow could come here and see that people are using 18 grains of powder in a 270 for reduced loads and think ..... if he can do it so can I ...... and then BOOM.
#13
RE: More than one sweet spot??
Sorry if I sounded a bit gruff, I was in a hurry when I wrote the last post, often times the wrong emotions are relayed when the words aren't carefully picked. My apologies.
I have to put a disclaimer in that I didn't get in my last post. The powder was 2400. The load would be used with a cast bullet. I wouldn't recommend using it with a jacketed bullet. I've only started experimenting with cast loads about a year ago, but I have some acquaintances that are old timers that have been making their own bullets for decades who are my mentors. Loads in rifle cases using red dot, unique, or 2400 and a few others aren't going to be found in too many reloading books, though there are a few. Noneof these powders will detonate, but there is a serious danger to the inattentive reloader who double charges. An old man I shoot with did do this and blew up his beautiful new Ruger M77. Don't try something new or outside the bounds of the reloading manuals unless you have read up on what you are about to do or are knowledgeable about what you are doing.
Be safe.
I have to put a disclaimer in that I didn't get in my last post. The powder was 2400. The load would be used with a cast bullet. I wouldn't recommend using it with a jacketed bullet. I've only started experimenting with cast loads about a year ago, but I have some acquaintances that are old timers that have been making their own bullets for decades who are my mentors. Loads in rifle cases using red dot, unique, or 2400 and a few others aren't going to be found in too many reloading books, though there are a few. Noneof these powders will detonate, but there is a serious danger to the inattentive reloader who double charges. An old man I shoot with did do this and blew up his beautiful new Ruger M77. Don't try something new or outside the bounds of the reloading manuals unless you have read up on what you are about to do or are knowledgeable about what you are doing.
Be safe.
#14
RE: More than one sweet spot??
ORIGINAL: bigbulls
You better listen to vangunsmith.
18 - 30 grains of powder in a case the size of a .270. You could blow something up real quick.
When a cartridge is under loaded or reduced it can result in a blown up firearm because the powder lays on the side wall of the cartridge and creates a large void and instead of the primer igniting the powder fully from the rear as it would with a full charge and where it is suppose to it sends sparks to the front of the case as well and also ingnites the front of the powder charge. When the powder burns from the front and the back at the same time it creates a huge surge in pressure when they meet.
Think of two waves in the ocean moving toward each other. When the two meet they create a single wave that is double the size of the two single waves. Much the same thing happens in underloaded cartridges. When the two pressure waves meet inside a cartridge you get a huge surge in pressure and bad things can happen.
You better listen to vangunsmith.
18 - 30 grains of powder in a case the size of a .270. You could blow something up real quick.
When a cartridge is under loaded or reduced it can result in a blown up firearm because the powder lays on the side wall of the cartridge and creates a large void and instead of the primer igniting the powder fully from the rear as it would with a full charge and where it is suppose to it sends sparks to the front of the case as well and also ingnites the front of the powder charge. When the powder burns from the front and the back at the same time it creates a huge surge in pressure when they meet.
Think of two waves in the ocean moving toward each other. When the two meet they create a single wave that is double the size of the two single waves. Much the same thing happens in underloaded cartridges. When the two pressure waves meet inside a cartridge you get a huge surge in pressure and bad things can happen.
#15
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: S Texas
Posts: 1,037
RE: More than one sweet spot??
Folks, I understand the cautions, and have read the report many times. Detonation CAN occur, and it HAS ben duplicated in the labs. many of you seem to be mis-interpering the results of the study.
Again;
DON"T TRY TO USE SLOW POWDERS FOR REDUCED LOADS!
Reduced loads are safe and useful with the proper powder.
You are right. That is why I cringe every time someone comes to the net, with NO knowledge of reloading, and says: "Hey, Bubba here. I've got my granpa's .30/06 and I'm gonna be getting a RBCLEE press. What powder do I use for making really hot loads? I've heard that reloading books have sissy loads 'cause of lawyers."
Someone always gives him a load, very often a top end load. Recipe for disaster, plain and simple. Folks, the net is a great resource, but only a resource. Buy a friggin reloading manual...actually, buy two of them! By manual, I mean Hornady's, or Lyman's od RCBS or Lee. A loadbook from a powder manufacturer isn't a loading manual, and it usually assumes a certain degree of safe loading practices and knowledge. If you don't have that knowledge, you can get into trouble damned quick. Read the bloody thing. THEN go to your 'putur and start asking questions.
With some powders (slow burners) and some cartridges (usually big volume cases), reduced charges are as dangerous, or more so, than over charges!
Getting back to Joe Blow, I ain't his poppa. Joe's gotta get some knowledge. If he doesn't spend a little time actually researching and studying, he's an idiot anyway, and I'm not going to assume any responsibility for his actions.
Again;
What happens, once in a while, when using reduced loads of really slow burners is the primer impulse bumps the bullet into the leade where the rifling stops it.
Reduced loads are safe and useful with the proper powder.
Not everyone that visits these forums is as knowledgable about reloading as others here. And I certainly don't claim to be a reloading guru. I've only been doing it a very short time off and on.
Joe Blow could come here and see that people are using 18 grains of powder in a 270 for reduced loads and think ..... if he can do it so can I ...... and then BOOM.
Joe Blow could come here and see that people are using 18 grains of powder in a 270 for reduced loads and think ..... if he can do it so can I ...... and then BOOM.
Someone always gives him a load, very often a top end load. Recipe for disaster, plain and simple. Folks, the net is a great resource, but only a resource. Buy a friggin reloading manual...actually, buy two of them! By manual, I mean Hornady's, or Lyman's od RCBS or Lee. A loadbook from a powder manufacturer isn't a loading manual, and it usually assumes a certain degree of safe loading practices and knowledge. If you don't have that knowledge, you can get into trouble damned quick. Read the bloody thing. THEN go to your 'putur and start asking questions.
With some powders (slow burners) and some cartridges (usually big volume cases), reduced charges are as dangerous, or more so, than over charges!
Getting back to Joe Blow, I ain't his poppa. Joe's gotta get some knowledge. If he doesn't spend a little time actually researching and studying, he's an idiot anyway, and I'm not going to assume any responsibility for his actions.
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: More than one sweet spot??
reducing loads,to much they can create VERY daangerous pressures
Kelbro, Hodgdon has out some nice reduced loads. Stick with thier data I suggest.