Yet another question . . .??
#5
Typical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 991
Federals brass is on par with the big 3, federal, winchester, remington, and holds up fine for normal reloading. It isn't the best, it isn't the worst. Thickness consistency is, as I said, on par with the others. Don't expect Lapua quality but for the average hunter/shooter it is fine. One thing to keep an eye out for with them is primer pocket tightness. If they have been hot rodded the primer pockets can get loose. I have a couple of hundred .243 cases on their 3rd loads for the twins and a couple hundred more on their 4rth load for my sister. All fed. brass the old man bought on sale a couple years back. He also bought 500 pieces of Lapua for the matched 7mm-08's he built for the twins. I also prefer Lapua for my .300wm since I tend to hot load for it and the 7mm-08's.
#7
Typical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 991
Only 1gr reduction on my hottest loads which, for the .300wm is pretty up there. If you use Lapua, just keep your eye out for tell tale pressure signs such as blown primers and extractor marks. Of course you should do that with them all but yes Lapua being a bit thicker walled it does have a higher pressure spike, especially with the slower powders.
#8
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 388
I've used Lapua on my .308 ammo and have had to throw a bunch away because of expended primer pockets. Before I "knew better". All would go boom when you puled he trigger, but a lot of them blew the primer out. However, I started using some Federal primers that are slightly larger than the Winchesters I'd been using and got a little more life out of them. I now know to reduce .308 loads 1.5gr. This after the water test. Next is to chrono Lapua loads to Other brass loads to compare muzzle velocity.
Last edited by dig4gold; 12-21-2017 at 06:01 AM.