Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Reloading
remington small rifle primers? >

remington small rifle primers?

Community
Reloading Share techniques for reloading, where to get the hottest in reloading equipment and learn how to reload from fellow hunters.

remington small rifle primers?

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-29-2009, 03:38 PM
  #1  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 55
Default remington small rifle primers?

just received a box 0f 1000 remington no.6 1/2 small rifle primers.
this new box has a warning on it that the last box i purchased did not have.warning: do not use in 17 rem,222 rem,223rem. does anyone know why this warning was added to the new primers? thanks for any information.
harrell is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 05:37 PM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Garfield NJ USA
Posts: 3,067
Default

Got me, first time I've ever heard not to use 6 1/2's in 222 or 223. Perhaps you should give Remington a call.
thndrchiken is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 05:49 PM
  #3  
Typical Buck
 
LaneNebraska's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 601
Default

Originally Posted by harrell
just received a box 0f 1000 remington no.6 1/2 small rifle primers.
this new box has a warning on it that the last box i purchased did not have.warning: do not use in 17 rem,222 rem,223rem. does anyone know why this warning was added to the new primers? thanks for any information.
The 17 rem, 204 ruger, 222, 223 all need the thickest/toughest primer because of the very high pressures involved in small rifles. Theses same rifles in semiauto/AR-15 configs are even at greater risk of Slam-Fires caused by the floating firing pin. The proper primers were specially designed by Rem are the 7 1/2's.

These are thicker and resist firing pin punctures and slam-fire ignitions.

You may be able to get by with(6 1/2's) bolt action rifles and moderate hand loads, but I wouldn't do it.

Last edited by LaneNebraska; 07-29-2009 at 05:51 PM.
LaneNebraska is offline  
Old 07-30-2009, 03:26 PM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,618
Default

I'm going to use them, my AR has a very lite trigger , so lite that it will not set a heavy off
cataway is offline  
Old 07-30-2009, 06:23 PM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Garfield NJ USA
Posts: 3,067
Default

Originally Posted by LaneNebraska
The 17 rem, 204 ruger, 222, 223 all need the thickest/toughest primer because of the very high pressures involved in small rifles. Theses same rifles in semiauto/AR-15 configs are even at greater risk of Slam-Fires caused by the floating firing pin. The proper primers were specially designed by Rem are the 7 1/2's.

These are thicker and resist firing pin punctures and slam-fire ignitions.

You may be able to get by with(6 1/2's) bolt action rifles and moderate hand loads, but I wouldn't do it.
How the heck do you figure that?, the 7 1/2 is a bench rest primer which means that the quality control and consistency is tighter for more consistant ignition. It has nothing to do with the cup metal being thicker or being able to handle higher pressure loads. Whoever told you that was just trying to sucker you into buying the more expensive primers. Every single loading manual says nothing about having to use BR primers for semi auto's.
thndrchiken is offline  
Old 07-30-2009, 09:08 PM
  #6  
Typical Buck
 
LaneNebraska's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 601
Default

Originally Posted by thndrchiken
How the heck do you figure that?, the 7 1/2 is a bench rest primer which means that the quality control and consistency is tighter for more consistant ignition. It has nothing to do with the cup metal being thicker or being able to handle higher pressure loads. Whoever told you that was just trying to sucker you into buying the more expensive primers. Every single loading manual says nothing about having to use BR primers for semi auto's.
Well, just a few other folks, including Remington, agree with me...

http://remington.custhelp.com/cgi-bi...i=&p_topview=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gMbu...eature=related

http://handgunforum.net/showthread.php?p=184210


http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/...d.php?t=334244


http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/...d.php?t=347895
LaneNebraska is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 05:14 AM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Garfield NJ USA
Posts: 3,067
Default

Well of course Remington will push for you to use the more expensive primer, they make more money. Nosler, Lyman, Speer, Winchester, Hornady and Barnes make absolutely no reference to the need to use match grade primers in semi's. the white box CCI primers specifically #34 and #41 are made to military spec. Wow the things that uninformed people will fall for. I guess the 30 plus years that people have been using standard primers everyone was all wrong, as well as the biggest names in the industry.
thndrchiken is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 06:51 AM
  #8  
Typical Buck
 
LaneNebraska's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 601
Default

The 6 1/2 has a softer cup and a lower brisance. It is very useful in small capcity cases of lower pressure like the 22H, 25-20, 32-20, etc. As mentioned it is not for use in the smaller higher pressure cartridges of the .222+ family. The 7 1/2 primer was developed especially for these smaller higher pressure cartridges. It has a stronger cup and more brisance conducive to the use of ball powders. The WSR primer is pretty much the same as is the Federal 205.

There are small rifle magnum primers such as CCI 450s.

Larry Gibson

I'm such a dupe that, I'll side with Larry, and on the side of safety.

LaneNebraska is offline  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:18 AM
  #9  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 422
Default

The cups ARE thicker on 7.5s. Use what you want. The manufacturer would not put that on there unless there was a compelling reason (lawsuits perhaps?).
kelbro is offline  
Old 08-09-2009, 07:06 AM
  #10  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 221
Default

Originally Posted by thndrchiken
Well of course Remington will push for you to use the more expensive primer, they make more money. Nosler, Lyman, Speer, Winchester, Hornady and Barnes make absolutely no reference to the need to use match grade primers in semi's. the white box CCI primers specifically #34 and #41 are made to military spec. Wow the things that uninformed people will fall for. I guess the 30 plus years that people have been using standard primers everyone was all wrong, as well as the biggest names in the industry.
How do you know they make more $ on the 7 1/2 then on the 6 1/2. The 7 1/2 are more expensive yes, but they also cost more to manufacture. Please post the cost analysis and profit margin for the two different types of primers in question.

Nosler, Lyman, Speer, Winchester, Hornady and Barnes make absolutely no reference to the need to use match grade primers in semi's.
They do make reference to primers with thicker cups though. Here is one example from Sierra.

Some makes may also utilize a thinner cup to guarantee reliability, although this is not always the case. The Remington 7 1/2 Benchrest primer, for example, uses a fairly thick cup. Sensitivity can become an issue here and may increase the risk of a slam-fire.

So, You go ahead and ignore the warnings of the Primer manufacturer, Bullet manufacturers and Powder manufactures. Shoot-em up, have fun. Just make sure you tell all your fellow shooters at the range to stand clear of you and your rifle.
steve4102 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.