Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Reloading
 Lyman dps 3 vs RCBS Chargemaster >

Lyman dps 3 vs RCBS Chargemaster

Community
Reloading Share techniques for reloading, where to get the hottest in reloading equipment and learn how to reload from fellow hunters.

Lyman dps 3 vs RCBS Chargemaster

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-28-2009, 07:05 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3
Default Lyman dps 3 vs RCBS Chargemaster

I want to purchase on of these powder dispensers/scale combos. Looking at lyman dps 3 or rcbs 1500 chargemaster. Thought I would ask everybody which one they reccommend. Looks like the old lymans used to have cleaning powder problems that dps 3 has fixed??? Which one does eveyone think I should buy. Thanks in advance for comments.
ddraper110 is offline  
Old 05-29-2009, 02:11 AM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,675
Default RE: Lyman dps 3 vs RCBS Chargemaster

I am very happy with my DPS3.
I have not used the RCBS unit
Hairtrigger is offline  
Old 05-29-2009, 05:28 AM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Garfield NJ USA
Posts: 3,067
Default RE: Lyman dps 3 vs RCBS Chargemaster

I have a DPS 2 with the speed upgrade making it a DPS 3, I really like it. The differences between the Lyman and the RCBS is that the Lyman is one unit, the RCBS is a separate scale and dispenser. The RCBS is rated for 300 gr larger loads and costs about $100 more. I primarily use mine to throw charges about 2/10's of a gr light and then trickle up on a separate scale. Many people just set the charge weight and rip. I don't think you can go wrong with either one. If I had to buy again I'd buy the Lyman due to the cost and size (being smaller) than the RCBS.
thndrchiken is offline  
Old 05-29-2009, 09:43 AM
  #4  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 356
Default old

removed by RD

Last edited by Ron Duval; 01-20-2010 at 01:04 PM.
Ron Duval is offline  
Old 05-29-2009, 10:20 AM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 86
Default RE: Lyman dps 3 vs RCBS Chargemaster

i have used my rcbs for 2 years now and it is great.
ihuntbuck is offline  
Old 09-05-2009, 01:00 PM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
redgreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 1,081
Default

I have the Lyman. and love it.
redgreen is offline  
Old 09-05-2009, 04:15 PM
  #7  
Giant Nontypical
 
jeepkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ****ifornia
Posts: 5,052
Default

I use the DPS II with the upgrade kit and it works great, never have used the RCBS but don't see why it wouldn't also be a nice unit...
jeepkid is offline  
Old 09-06-2009, 05:16 AM
  #8  
Typical Buck
 
LaneNebraska's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 601
Default

I have the RCBS 1500 Chargemaster and love it. It is very fast, Faster than I can work a balance beam, and dead-on 99% of the time. I used to check it every 5 loads, against my old 502 balance beam. Now I just don't bother
LaneNebraska is offline  
Old 09-06-2009, 05:21 AM
  #9  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,675
Default

On other forums I see a RCBS unit for sale for $270 shipped if you have not made a purchase
Hairtrigger is offline  
Old 09-07-2009, 12:25 PM
  #10  
Nontypical Buck
 
Pawildman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: S.W. Pa.-- Heart in North Central Pa. mountains-
Posts: 2,600
Default

I bought a DPS3 some time ago. The first time I set it up and used it, it functioned fine. The second time I tried to use it, it wouldn't repeat, and wouldn't move to the next charge weight I had programmed in. I've set it aside and gone back to my old Ohaus balance beam. I need to call the factory and see what they want to do about it. It may be a simple fix, but needless to say, I'm not a happy camper over it.
Pawildman is offline  


Quick Reply: Lyman dps 3 vs RCBS Chargemaster


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.