Community
Reloading Share techniques for reloading, where to get the hottest in reloading equipment and learn how to reload from fellow hunters.

Velocity vs barrel length

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-07-2007 | 01:35 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default Velocity vs barrel length

I have a 270 and shoot Hornady factory rounds currently out of Remington 700 with 22" barrel. Stated velocity is 3060 fps with 24" barrel, how much slower do you think my gun shoots with 22" barrel. I don't have access to a chronograph yet.
bigbadjim is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-2007 | 03:46 PM
  #2  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Velocity vs barrel length

You lose roughly 50fps for every 2 inches of barrel length.
speyrjb is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-2007 | 04:03 PM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,667
Likes: 0
From: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Default RE: Velocity vs barrel length

Stated velocity is 3060 fps with 24" barrel, how much slower do you think my gun shoots with 22" barrel.
Velocity varies with chamber dimensions and barrel dimensions as well as with barrel length.You should be somewhere between 2900fps,and 3000fps,but without a chronograph,you are only guessing.
stubblejumper is offline  
Reply
Old 12-08-2007 | 04:49 AM
  #4  
HighDesertWolf's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,171
Likes: 0
From: A flat lander lost in the mountains of Northern,AZ
Default RE: Velocity vs barrel length

I honestly wouldnt even worry about it, I gave up reloading for velocity along time ago mainly because top velocities and accuracy arent in the same load. Even if the velocity loss was 200 fps it wouldnt matter because a deers rib cages doesnt have a chronograph in it and wether a projectile goes through their guts at 3,000 fps or 2,800 fps second doesnt matter. either velocity the deer is gonna die.
HighDesertWolf is offline  
Reply
Old 12-08-2007 | 10:15 AM
  #5  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,667
Likes: 0
From: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Default RE: Velocity vs barrel length

honestly wouldnt even worry about it, I gave up reloading for velocity along time ago mainly because top velocities and accuracy arent in the same load.
That depends on the rifle.Some rifles shoot most accurately with maximum loads,and some shoot most accurately when downloaded.
stubblejumper is offline  
Reply
Old 12-08-2007 | 05:56 PM
  #6  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Velocity vs barrel length

The Lyman reloading manual did a chronograph test of factory ammo vs. the manufacturers claims. The .270s averaged around 150-200 fps less with 22" barrels.
kelbro is offline  
Reply
Old 12-08-2007 | 09:59 PM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Velocity vs barrel length

ORIGINAL: HighDesertWolf

I gave up reloading for velocity along time ago mainly because top velocities and accuracy arent in the same load.
I am quickly realizing this. I have been testing different hand loads in a new rifle and none of the upper end loads shoot as well as the middle loads do out of this rifle anyways.
SJAdventures is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2007 | 06:37 AM
  #8  
eldeguello's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,270
Likes: 0
From: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Default RE: Velocity vs barrel length

ORIGINAL: stubblejumper

Stated velocity is 3060 fps with 24" barrel, how much slower do you think my gun shoots with 22" barrel.
Velocity varies with chamber dimensions and barrel dimensions as well as with barrel length.You should be somewhere between 2900fps,and 3000fps,but without a chronograph,you are only guessing.
Stubblejumper is essentially correct. As a rule, with a cartridge with the expansion ratio of the .270, we say you can expect to lose bertween 25-30 FPS per inch that you chop off. A magnum case like the 7mm Rem Mag the loss goes up to the vicinity of 50 FPS/inch.

HOWEVER: All rifles don't lose the same amount, and in some cases, people have reported a GAIN in chronographed velocity after shortening a barrel! Bottom line: Stubblejumper said "chronograph it." That is the only way you'll ever know about your specific rifle.

I once owned two Mannlicher-Schoenauer .270 carbines. I used the 130 and 150-grain Nosler Partition bullets in them, with 55.5 and 53.5 grains of IMR 4350 respectively. The 130-grain load chronographed 2880 FPS, and the 150 made 2820 FPS from both guns. Both had 20" barrels with 1/9" twist. Both shot into 1.25 MOA, and were very deadly little rifles. I would not feel handicapped having to use a .270 anywhere in North America, nor for non-dangerous game in Africa.
eldeguello is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2007 | 06:39 AM
  #9  
eldeguello's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,270
Likes: 0
From: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Default RE: Velocity vs barrel length

ORIGINAL: stubblejumper

honestly wouldnt even worry about it, I gave up reloading for velocity along time ago mainly because top velocities and accuracy arent in the same load.
That depends on the rifle.Some rifles shoot most accurately with maximum loads,and some shoot most accurately when downloaded.
100% correct!
eldeguello is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jimmy the foot
Guns
1
04-12-2009 06:12 AM
bowbender6
Black Powder
5
01-18-2008 06:42 PM
biscuit jake
Guns
7
03-23-2007 03:27 PM
ejpaul1
Guns
18
03-01-2006 08:12 PM
MOTurkeyTamer
Reloading
10
05-14-2004 09:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.