Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics
Katie Hopkins - Get Furious and Fight Back >

Katie Hopkins - Get Furious and Fight Back

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Katie Hopkins - Get Furious and Fight Back

Old 08-07-2018, 09:41 PM
  #11  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,435
Default

Originally Posted by Mickey Finn View Post
"What do you base that one? She is married and has 2 daughters that she talks about quite often."

"She talks about not being gay and married to her husband although her sex orientation is kind of irrelevant--it's the message and observations she's making. Mickey, do you know something different?"

Come on guys. That's the oldest dodge in the book. Listen to what she says and the way she undermines (emasculates) her Husband. Then look how she always attacks men. Not only that but the way she goes about it. Sadly a lot of men are so used to being treated this way they don't notice.

As far as her message goes she is making big money appealing to the lower natures of her listeners. It's hate speech poorly disguised as something else.

The UK has a problem with Islamic extremism that's no mistake. But the major of London is not a suspect.
So the takeaway here is that you disagree with the lady and are accusing her of being lesbian and uttering hate speech. No arguments or evidence offered to prove that she's wrong. Not even any actual evidence to prove that your assertion about her being a lesbian is correct. Just cast aspersions at the messenger when you disagree with the message. Hmmmm....
elkman30 is offline  
Old 08-08-2018, 02:48 AM
  #12  
Boone & Crockett
 
Oldtimr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: south eastern PA
Posts: 13,721
Default

Typical democrat tactic. If you don't like what they say, excoriate them with nonsense and hope some of it sticks.
Oldtimr is online now  
Old 08-08-2018, 04:16 AM
  #13  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,535
Default

Originally Posted by Mickey Finn View Post
"What do you base that one? She is married and has 2 daughters that she talks about quite often."

"She talks about not being gay and married to her husband although her sex orientation is kind of irrelevant--it's the message and observations she's making. Mickey, do you know something different?"

Come on guys. That's the oldest dodge in the book.
Were you born goofy or did you have to work at it. By the same consideration I guess I should ask you how your boyfriend is doing right?
flags is offline  
Old 08-08-2018, 07:03 PM
  #14  
Nontypical Buck
 
Mickey Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,952
Default

Originally Posted by flags View Post
Were you born goofy or did you have to work at it. By the same consideration I guess I should ask you how your boyfriend is doing right?
Careful, or we'll both be banned again.

Lets just forget I used the "G" word and move on........
Mickey Finn is offline  
Old 08-08-2018, 07:09 PM
  #15  
Nontypical Buck
 
Mickey Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,952
Default

Originally Posted by JagMagMan View Post
First off, I didn't mean it to be "very kind!" The PC gloves are OFF!
If you can't see that our "American national solvency," is not at stake, you are just a blind puppet of the Socialist DEM Party!

Our nation, our freedom and our Constitution, are but one step away from becoming extinct!

If we give in to the United Nations philosophy, America will become one of HUNDREDS of nations! We will have NO control over what we do, and we will be out-voted on every stance that we take!

The liberal, LEFT, Socialist view IS to give up our national solvency! Is that what you really want for America?
Huh? Extinct?
Mickey Finn is offline  
Old 08-08-2018, 07:12 PM
  #16  
Nontypical Buck
 
Mickey Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,952
Default

Originally Posted by elkman30 View Post
So the takeaway here is that you disagree with the lady and are accusing her of being lesbian and uttering hate speech. No arguments or evidence offered to prove that she's wrong. Not even any actual evidence to prove that your assertion about her being a lesbian is correct. Just cast aspersions at the messenger when you disagree with the message. Hmmmm....
Call it a hunch. Now focus on what she is saying and the language and inflection that she deploys. Once you have a grip on that compare it to a few of our other political hacks on TV.
Mickey Finn is offline  
Old 08-08-2018, 09:27 PM
  #17  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,435
Default

A hunch????? Are you reading what you're writing?? I understand that you disagree with what she's saying. But are you reading what you wrote???
elkman30 is offline  
Old 08-09-2018, 04:26 AM
  #18  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,535
Default

Originally Posted by Mickey Finn View Post
Careful, or we'll both be banned again.

Lets just forget I used the "G" word and move on........
OK. But your post was poorly thought out and was childish. Is that better.

I fully understand that you are a LIB and a union hack and will automatically take offense to anyone that is conservative, and Katie Hopkins is a well know English conservative but that does not give you leeway to make comments about the lady that you cannot prove nor have any knowledge of. I don't know where you get off in making those types of judgemental accusations but such actions are right out of the LIB playbook.
flags is offline  
Old 08-09-2018, 04:49 AM
  #19  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 6,221
Default

Right on! I watched the whole of this video with my wife. I do a considerable amount of reading in French, following French cultural and political news, by reading French books and on-line French news papers -- or I used to a couple of years ago. I've sort of moved on with that regard. France is the "spear point" for this problem. I think it is fair to say there are more immigrants and cultural invaders in France than in any other nation of Europe, on a proportional basis. It is entirely consistent with what the woman says. I get corroboration of this story from so many independent sources and directions it simply is not disputable.

The question arises how this threat and this problem are not visible to the open eye. Well, but they ARE visible. The real question is what accounts for the impairment of vision and understanding to acknowledge what is in fact visible. I think the simple explanation is "ideology." Ideology is NOT responsive to evidence and experience. No proofs or evidence can loosen the grip ideology uses to hold the brain. Part of the problem is a foolish attitude that "we are all alike." We all have shared values. We are all good democrats. We are all good egalitarians. Not true. The folks Hopkins is talking about are not good democrats or good egalitarians.
Alsatian is offline  
Old 08-09-2018, 07:03 AM
  #20  
Giant Nontypical
 
JagMagMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Neches, Texas
Posts: 5,514
Default

I'm right with you and Flags on this! The gender, race, nationality or sexual orientation of the person giving a first-hand, eye-witness warning of impending trouble is irrelevant! MF's blind obliviousness to the facts, proves beyond doubt that most DEM's are incapable of thinking rationally for themselves! Hopkins is clearly warning America of what happens when the radical Muslim camel gets it's nose under the tent!
I wonder if MF was drowning, would he accept a life-line from anyone else than a certified, liberal, DEM? No, probably not! Surely he'd look to see if the rope was "union made!"
JagMagMan is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.