Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics
DNC and the klintoons: Dead Bodies Keep Piling UP >

DNC and the klintoons: Dead Bodies Keep Piling UP

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

DNC and the klintoons: Dead Bodies Keep Piling UP

Old 05-22-2017, 02:04 PM
  #1  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
JagMagMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Neches, Texas
Posts: 5,514
Default DNC and the klintoons: Dead Bodies Keep Piling UP

The DNC and especially the klintoons have had a nasty habit of leaving a trail of dead bodies behind them over the years!
There MAY NOT be anything but "coincidence," but wherever they go, there are dead bodies left behind! The latest being Seth Rich, a deceased DNC Staffer (shot in a robbery in which NOTHING was taken!)
Rich was reportedly a Wiki Leaks informant! (Wiki Leaks has NEVER been PROVEN wrong BTW!)
Hmm.............It seems to me that there is way more evidence against the DNC/klintoons, than there is against ANY of the accusations against Donald Trump!
JagMagMan is offline  
Old 05-23-2017, 04:24 AM
  #2  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,126
Default

Originally Posted by JagMagMan View Post
It seems to me that there is way more evidence against the DNC/klintoons, than there is against ANY of the accusations against Donald Trump!
Careful now, can't go around confusing the LIBs with facts! Gonna make their little heads explode.
flags is offline  
Old 05-23-2017, 05:40 AM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
JagMagMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Neches, Texas
Posts: 5,514
Default

Yeah you are right, The only facts that matter to LIB's are the facts that they make up!
JagMagMan is offline  
Old 05-23-2017, 07:19 AM
  #4  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 5,994
Default

Originally Posted by JagMagMan View Post
Rich was reportedly a Wiki Leaks informant! (Wiki Leaks has NEVER been PROVEN wrong BTW!)

Be careful how you word this. WikiLeaks has NOT stipulated that Rich was the informant. Thus, while it is true WikiLeaks has a very high reputation for telling the truth . . . the report that Rich is a WikiLeaks informant DOES NOT come from WikiLeaks, hence WikiLeaks's reputation for truth-telling cannot be used to corroborate the truth of that report.


I have heard this report also. I find it very interesting. It would rock our politics if it was demonstrated to be true. This report has been around for a very, very long time, by the way. Since before the election. Wikileaks has from the beginning denied the DNC email leaks came from Russia. Wikileaks early this year went further and said not only did the DNC email leaks not come from Russian . . . they did not come from ANY foreign state. So where did the DNC emails come from if not some foreign state?!!! Possibly an insider.


Now some would say the story of the DNC and/or Hillary campaign commissioning the murder of a turncoat would be the big story. It is a big story. To my mind, however, the more significant dimension to this would be the whole "Russia hacked the election" narrative goes "POOF!!!!" if the emails were stolen from the DNC by an insider. No allegation has been made that Russia tampered with electronic voting infrastructure. The only thing that has been alleged is Russia hacked the DNC and stole their emails and leaked them to WikiLeaks. Where would the investigation of Russian interference in the election be at that point -- at the point where it is known a DNC insider leaked the emails? Where would the reputations of the American press be that have hawked this story and traded in character assassination and innuendo? Where would the reputation of some of our top intelligence officials be who said this hack had "Russian fingerprints on it?" That is a pretty big story.


But for the present, don't say Wikileaks has validated this story. They have not. It may be true, but let's not jump the gun.
Alsatian is offline  
Old 05-23-2017, 10:42 AM
  #5  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
JagMagMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Neches, Texas
Posts: 5,514
Default

Originally Posted by Alsatian View Post
Be careful how you word this. WikiLeaks has NOT stipulated that Rich was the informant. Thus, while it is true WikiLeaks has a very high reputation for telling the truth . . . the report that Rich is a WikiLeaks informant DOES NOT come from WikiLeaks, hence WikiLeaks's reputation for truth-telling cannot be used to corroborate the truth of that report.
Yes, it's not an actual "fact," but WikiLeaks has not denied it either!
But, over the years plenty of dead bodies have piled up around the DNC and klintoons! Coincidence? Perhaps and perhaps not!

But all of these investigations and allegations that are ongoing are not based on any "facts," just anonymous leaks! More than likely dreamed up by demo-libtard's. You know, throw enough crap out, and maybe some will stick!
JagMagMan is offline  
Old 05-23-2017, 11:45 AM
  #6  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 5,994
Default

The Clintons are yesterday's news (that is, unless Trump re-opens the investigation into Clinton's email server and mishandling of classified material or opens a new investigation into selling of US government influence for contributions to the Clinton Foundation -- "pay for play" -- which could happen). I don't care about them. The story of the DNC email leak however DOES remain of intense interest. There is not much evidence at all that the DNC email leak was perpetrated by Russia, but yet that is the WHOLE gravamen of the investigation of the Trump/Russia connection. No Russian hack -- no Trump-Russia connection to probe. The statement that there were "Russian fingerprints on the hack" is not very convincing to me . . . or to any person with much sophistication in the ways of cybersecurity. Hacking tools rarely remain the sole property of any hacker for very long before everyone has their hands on the same hacking tools. Hence . . . how can we use the analogy of fingerprints? Fingerprints are HIGHLY individualized. Hacking traces are NOT highly individualized. But that is ALL that has been advanced in this case to argue Russia is involved.

That is the real story. That is where the focus needs to be turned: what is the case for Russia involvement. Everyone -- both on the right and the left in the news media and in government -- seems to admit without any challenge that so much is certain. Yes, verily, Russia hacked the election. Isn't that foundational point worth exercising some scepticism about? Really? How do we know this -- because some discredited intelligence chief from the Obama administration -- who is so incompetent he can't even identify who, of the very small number of people have access, has unmasked intelligence on US citizens -- said there were "Russian fingerprints on the hack." Self-serving conjecture.
Alsatian is offline  
Old 05-23-2017, 12:17 PM
  #7  
Boone & Crockett
 
Oldtimr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: south eastern PA
Posts: 12,950
Default

If they keep messing with him, that is exactly what Trump should do. Go after the golden girl of the left, the statute is still probably still open to prosecution. Two can play the game the left and the media, of course one and the same, are playing.
Oldtimr is offline  
Old 05-23-2017, 01:56 PM
  #8  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
JagMagMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Neches, Texas
Posts: 5,514
Default

My point is THEY committed actual crimes, not just "gray areas!" There is actual proof of these crimes, and no one cares!

But, we have a half dozen "investigations," on the POTUS, with not one, single shred of evidence or any facts! Just the word of mysterious, "anonymous," sources!

Which one of the above fit the definition of a "witch hunt?"
JagMagMan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.