Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics
Catholic Church Lists Climate Change As No. 1 Pro-life Issue >

Catholic Church Lists Climate Change As No. 1 Pro-life Issue

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Catholic Church Lists Climate Change As No. 1 Pro-life Issue

Old 06-12-2014, 01:45 PM
  #1  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
Knightia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wy
Posts: 8,641
Default Catholic Church Lists Climate Change As No. 1 Pro-life Issue

I Didnt realize they where so involved in the man made climate change issue & spreading that message( they been watching cosmos 3?).

So millions of humans have been aborted(killed by choice( except places like china- how many there alone?)- whats the worse case expected outcome of manmade global warming?(besides longer growing seasons, ,more crops in norther lattatuides, less money & energy needed to heat homes? ) But i guess if all natural disasters are now claimed to be man made( as seems to be the trend-) Guess those to will be controled along with the global climate hmm http://www.designntrend.com/articles...life-issue.htm

From the same site- Science( maybe its just me or how its written- seems abit odd)

Climate Change Is Not Uniform And Leads To Warming And Cooling Of Planethttp://www.designntrend.com/articles/13534/20140505/climate-change-is-not-uniform-and-leads-to-warming-and-cooling-of-planet.htm
Knightia is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 02:12 PM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,431
Default

This is based on an editorial in "The National Catholic Reporter."

It's not an official announcement by the Church. Some people do like the idea of the Church being involved in liberal politics.


http://ncronline.org/blogs/eco-catho...pro-life-issue
cr422 is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 02:25 PM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
Knightia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wy
Posts: 8,641
Default

Ahh non offical ok.And dont work for the church( just some ppl who belong to it?) id guess?

Not that i belong to that church or anyone elses- just seemed a like strange Prioritys etc
Knightia is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 04:08 PM
  #4  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 979
Default

not taking a stance either way, but suppose prolifer's are wrong about climate change and the scientist are right. Wouldn't that be worse than abortion if it killed millions. They have a point.
stormyday395 is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 04:19 PM
  #5  
Dominant Buck
 
Fieldmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 36,321
Default

Originally Posted by stormyday395 View Post
not taking a stance either way, but suppose prolifer's are wrong about climate change and the scientist are right. Wouldn't that be worse than abortion if it killed millions. They have a point.
Which scientist are you speaking of? The small group of them who push global warming because their living depends on it or the larger group that calls it a hoax?
Fieldmouse is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 04:32 PM
  #6  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 979
Default

Originally Posted by Fieldmouse View Post
Which scientist are you speaking of? The small group of them who push global warming because their living depends on it or the larger group that calls it a hoax?
last I heard about 90% agree. I'm not fully convinced myself, but the weather has been pretty wacky. Is it natural nature? not what they are saying. Can you do anything you want to the atmosphere and planet without any change? no I don't think so.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus
stormyday395 is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 04:39 PM
  #7  
Dominant Buck
 
Fieldmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 36,321
Default

Originally Posted by stormyday395 View Post
last I heard about 90% agree. I'm not fully convinced myself, but the weather has been pretty wacky. Is it natural nature? not what they are saying. Can you do anything you want to the atmosphere and planet without any change? no I don't think so.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus
Huh, you're kidding right? 90%
Fieldmouse is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 04:57 PM
  #8  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
Knightia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wy
Posts: 8,641
Default

Sure i can kinda understand why they might no want to say much while still working for nasa & gov
49 Former NASA Scientists Send A Letter Disputing Climate Change



Some prominent voices at NASA are fed up with the agency's activist stance toward climate change.
The following letter asking the agency to move away from climate models and to limit its stance to what can be empirically proven, was sent by 49 former NASA scientists and astronauts.

The letter criticizes the Goddard Institute For Space Studies especially, where director Jim Hansen and climatologist Gavin Schmidt have been outspoken advocates for action.

The press release with attached letter is below.



Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-...#ixzz34TLHH1lW


Why Doesn’t Greenpeace Demand a Congressional Probe of James Hansen’s Outside Income?

NASA records released to resolve litigation filed by the American Tradition Institute reveal that Dr. James E. Hansen, an astronomer, received approximately $1.6 million in outside, direct cash income in the past five years for work related to — and, according to his benefactors, often expressly for — his public service as a global warming activist within NASA.

This does not include six-figure income over that period in travel expenses to fly around the world to receive money from outside interests. As specifically detailed below, Hansen failed to report tens of thousands of dollars in global travel provided to him by outside parties — including to London, Paris, Rome, Oslo, Tokyo, the Austrian Alps, Bilbao, California, Australia and elsewhere, often business or first-class and also often paying for his wife as well — to receive honoraria to speak about the topic of his taxpayer-funded employment, or get cash awards for his activism and even for his past testimony and other work for NASA.

Ethics laws require that such payments or gifts be reported on an SF278 public financial disclosure form. As detailed, below, Hansen nonetheless regularly refused to report this income.
http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02...utside-income/
Knightia is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 05:03 PM
  #9  
Dominant Buck
 
Fieldmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 36,321
Default

Yep, like I said, their living depends on it.
Fieldmouse is offline  
Old 06-13-2014, 05:08 AM
  #10  
Little Doe Peep
 
sachiko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 14,945
Wink

Here is a list of scientists who do not support AGW.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scienti...global_warming

Here's another article by prominent scientists who don't believe in AGW.

(This one takes forever to load.)


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...Global-Warming


And here's an article in Forbes about a peer-reviewed survey suggesting that a majority of scientist and engineers do NOT support AGW.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestay...arming-crisis/

There are more articles, but you get the idea.

Of course the mainstream media never cites these findings, only the Chicken Little prattlings.
sachiko is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.