Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics
Obama makes free speech illegal >

Obama makes free speech illegal

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Obama makes free speech illegal

Old 01-19-2013, 07:36 PM
  #1  
Boone & Crockett
Thread Starter
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,679
Default Obama makes free speech illegal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKjy0PDlKV4

Last edited by CalHunter; 01-20-2013 at 11:40 PM.
bigbulls is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 12:49 AM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
RobertSubnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,728
Default

Wow...."supported by both parties..."

I am not a lawyer but it seems to me that the ACLU should be walking into court right about now.

The secret service can decide??? Uumm, no, the constitution has already made this quite clear.
RobertSubnet is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 04:46 AM
  #3  
Boone & Crockett
 
The Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burleson Texas
Posts: 12,558
Default

Barry is wanting more and more to be like Hitler; and he's catching up with him.
The Rev is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 06:02 AM
  #4  
Little Doe Peep
 
sachiko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 14,945
Cool

Originally Posted by The Rev View Post
Barry is wanting more and more to be like Hitler; and he's catching up with him.
But did you catch that "supported by both parties?"

What's going on here?



The sheep have taken the weekend off so as to avoid being confused with liberals
sachiko is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 11:15 AM
  #5  
Boone & Crockett
Thread Starter
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,679
Default

Here's the text of the bill. It looks to me that they could literally designate just about any where or anything as "restricted grounds" or "disruptive conduct", or "official function".

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.


This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Restricted Buildings
and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011’’.


SEC. 2. RESTRICTED BUILDING OR GROUNDS.


Section 1752 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to
read as follows:


‘‘§ 1752. Restricted building or grounds


‘‘(a) Whoever—
‘‘(1) knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building
or grounds without lawful authority to do so;
‘‘(2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the
orderly conduct of Government business or official functions,
engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such
proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so
that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly
conduct of Government business or official functions;
‘‘(3) knowingly, and with the intent to impede or disrupt
the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions,
obstructs or impedes ingress or egress to or from any restricted
building or grounds; or
‘‘(4) knowingly engages in any act of physical violence
against any person or property in any restricted building or
grounds;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished as provided
in subsection (b).
‘‘(b) The punishment for a violation of subsection (a) is—
‘‘(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more
than 10 years, or both, if—
‘‘(A) the person, during and in relation to the offense,
uses or carries a deadly or dangerous weapon or firearm;
or
‘‘(B) the offense results in significant bodily injury as
defined by section 2118(e)(3); and
‘‘(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more
than one year, or both, in any other case.
‘‘(c) In this section—
H. R. 347—2
‘‘(1) the term ‘restricted buildings or grounds’ means any
posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area—
‘‘(A) of the White House or its grounds, or the Vice
President’s official residence or its grounds;
‘‘(B) of a building or grounds where the President or
other person protected by the Secret Service is or will
be temporarily visiting; or
‘‘(C) of a building or grounds so restricted in conjunction
with an event designated as a special event of national
significance; and
‘‘(2) the term ‘other person protected by the Secret Service’
means any person whom the United States Secret Service is
authorized to protect under section 3056 of this title or by
Presidential memorandum, when such person has not declined
such protection.’’.


Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate



.
bigbulls is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 03:23 PM
  #6  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,868
Default

Originally Posted by sachiko View Post
But did you catch that "supported by both parties?"

What's going on here?



The sheep have taken the weekend off so as to avoid being confused with liberals
Hitler took power by the votes of both parties.

This idea is not new, round here the local town passed an ordinance creating a free speech zone. Speak freely outside of that zone during certain public functions and your arrested. I warned those in favor of it, but they wouldn't listen. Shortly after that the same supporters were up in arms, a group they supported were hauled off, costing the town 10,000 to do it. They hauled off 3 Occupiers.

The town could've just not listened to the street preacher, instead they had to try and shut any up by limiting the Bill of Rights. What was his message, sodomy is an abomination. Just "like the days of Sodom and Gomorrah".

This action will not solve the problem, just make things worse.

Still not to later to invest in the boom industry of the not so distant future, personal security.
nodog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.