Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics
If George Bush was an idiot... >

If George Bush was an idiot...

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

If George Bush was an idiot...

Old 09-16-2010, 02:54 PM
  #1  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
BlackLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver Washington USA
Posts: 2,911
Default If George Bush was an idiot...

If George Bush was an idiot...





If George W. Bush had doubled the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved?


If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?


If George W. Bush had criticized a state law that he admitted he never even read, would you think that he is just an ignorant hot head?


If George W. Bush joined the country of Mexico and sued a state in the United States to force that state to continue to allow illegal immigration, would you question his patriotism and wonder who's side he was on?


If George W. Bush had put 87000 workers out of work by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore all oil drilling on companies that have one of the best safety records of any industry because one company had an accident would you have agreed?


If George W. Bush had used a forged document as the basis of the moratorium that would render 87000 American workers unemployed would you support him?


If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a "TelePrompter" installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?


If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?


If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?


If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?


If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?


If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?


If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved?


If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?


If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved?


If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states in the United States, would you have said that he is clueless?


If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking out his front door in Texas, would you have thought he was a self important, conceited, egotistical jerk?


If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" ("the 5th of 4"?) in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the "Cinco de Mayo" (the 5th of May), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?


If George W. Bush had misspelled the word "advice" would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and "potatoe" as proof of what a dunce he is?


If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite?


If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?


If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?


If George W. Bush had created the positions of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America, would you have approved.


If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?





So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive?

Can't think of anything?

Don't worry.

He did all this in 15 months -- you now have two years & three months to come up with an answer.


Every statement in this email is factual and directly attributable to Barrack Hussein Obama.

Every bumble is a matter of record and completely verifiable.


LET'S SEE HOW MANY OF YOU FORWARD THIS!
BlackLab is offline  
Old 09-17-2010, 04:56 AM
  #2  
Boone & Crockett
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ponce de Leon Florida USA
Posts: 10,079
Default

Worst president in history? Definitely, IMHO, the worst in my lifetime, easily beating out my previous #1 of LBJ and #2 Carter. I bite my tongue to say it, but it would have been better to have Hillary.
timbercruiser is offline  
Old 09-17-2010, 07:20 AM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,224
Default

At least I doubt he has a chance to get re-elected. Though he can still do a lot of damage until then
JeffS is offline  
Old 09-17-2010, 08:37 AM
  #4  
LBR
Boone & Crockett
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mississippi USA
Posts: 15,296
Default

I'm thinking that by Nov. 2 he'll be a lame duck, at least for all practical purposes. He'll then spend the next two years blaming Republicans and President Bush for everything he's screwed up......pretty much identical to the first two years, except he won't have the power to screw up nearly as much.
LBR is offline  
Old 09-18-2010, 04:53 AM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pulaskiville
Posts: 3,533
Default

Obama definitely took off his mask after election. During his campaign he tried to remain the "conservative liberal". That couldn't be farther from the truth.

Hillary would have been a better choice by far. But then, we'd have to deal with her screaming. It would be nice to see more of Bill running around, though.. What he got away with in office always makes me smile.......or cry. LOL
Pro-Line is offline  
Old 09-19-2010, 06:36 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 377
Default

If a president proudly proclaimed to the world that he would get the persons responsible for 911 and then failed to get the man most responsible would you consider him an idiot.

If a president invaded a sovereign country based on that's country supposed possession of weapons of mass destruction, would you consider him an idiot?

If the president spent over a trillion dollars and thousands of lives to invaded a stable secular country and that country was left in anarchy bordering on a muslim theocracy, would you consider him an idiot?

If the president signed the largest entitlement bill in your lifetime against the wishes of his own constituency, would you consider him an idiot?

If the president sat idly by and let millions of American jobs be taken by asian slave labor, would you consider him an idiot?

If a president spent so much money that he had to borrow from an autocratic government in unspeakable amounts and made his country's solvency dependent on that nation, would you consider him an idiot?

If a president said nothing and did nothing to prevent the greatest banking collapse and left his successor a shattered economy, would you consider him an idiot?

Obama's bad but he is no worse than Bush was. It took Bush a cool 8 years to inflict his damage. Obama is only poking more holes in a leaky scow. Give me a Clinton and partisan antagonistic Congress. Never ever give me an Executive and Legislative branch that agree with each other, we are screwed then.
hockeydad is offline  
Old 09-20-2010, 05:18 PM
  #7  
Giant Nontypical
 
vc1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 9,626
Default

Not sure where you got it, BlackLab, but it is a great post.
vc1111 is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 05:21 AM
  #8  
Nontypical Buck
 
Howler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Elizabeth Colo. USA
Posts: 4,413
Default

remind us again how good the first 6 years of the Bush term was Hockeydad, and then admit things really went down hill when the Dems. got control of Congress for his last two years, and THAT is when things really started to go down hill.,.
Howler is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 06:55 AM
  #9  
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 11,551
Default

Originally Posted by hockeydad View Post

If a president invaded a sovereign country based on that's country supposed possession of weapons of mass destruction, would you consider him an idiot?
Once again, for the left wing trolls who think Bush just dreamed up the whole "WMD thing" so that he could invade Iraq to avenge his daddy...

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" - Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
You lefties need to give that one a rest. You were complicit in the whole thing... I'd refute the rest of your buffoonery, but, that one is just too easy, and I really don't have time to spend on the other socialist talking-points drivel.
ipscshooter is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 03:48 PM
  #10  
Nontypical Buck
 
BarnesX.308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Audubon & Red Rock, Penna.
Posts: 4,472
Default

If George Bush had a D in front of his name, a lot of his critics would have loved him.
BarnesX.308 is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.