Dan O.

The Wiarton paper carried the article listed in the attached link:

http://www.wiartonecho.com/story.php?id=66110

The fellow thought he was protecting his property but the MNR has a different definition. The bears in the Wiarton area are getting overpopulated since the spring bear hunt was cancelled. The natural food sources aren' t adequite so the bears are becoming dumpster hoppers. It' ll take a human death or two before someone inthe government sees a problem.

This is starting to smell like Walkerton water.

Dan O.

iceman39

gee Dan you right about,saying that it will take a couple of humans death.

Turk_man

Hey since when is shooting a bear in the arse classed as protecting your property? Seems if the bear is going the other way then you`ve scared it off. And if your going to shoot it make sure you kill it and just SHUT-UP, northerners have been doing it for years, shoot `em and ditch them.(they don`t come back that way).

lwpruitt

if any of you guys need any help with the bears just let me know ,i would make the trip up there to get one.thanks [email protected]

Dan O.

I' d let you loose on my property but I' d need to be a resort operator/guide to allow a nonresident to hunt bear.

Dan O.

seadog

The problem with the fact that someone will get hurt is, the wrong person/persons will be the victims. Would like nothing better than to see the people who supported this be the ones who get mauled.

lwpruitt

thanks Dan ,i wish i could help you out on the bears,or just be able to run them some with hounds..