Community
Optics Quality optics are a must-have for any serious hunter. Discuss them here.

Does a Burris Euro Diamond really compare to a Swarovski

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-15-2012 | 07:42 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: North Dakota
Default Does a Burris Euro Diamond really compare to a Swarovski

I have an opportunity to purchase a pair of about ten year old Swarovski SL 8x56 binocs in great shape with new lense covers for $850. But I can get a pair of Burris Euro Diamond 12x50 binocs brand new for $750. I know Burris makes pretty good scopes, but I don't know anyone who has ever owned a pair of Burris Binocs. I have read some reviews claiming the Euro Diamonds are somewhat comparable to Swarovski SLC's, but I also know that with optics, you usually get what you pay for, and the Burris is about a third the cost of the Swarovski's new. I wouldn't consider myself a die hard hunter, so I would probably never consider dropping $2000 on a pair of new Swarovskis, but $850 sound like a great price to me. Next to overall clarity, light gathering is probably my #1 priority with binocs, and from what I've seen Swarovskis are the best for that. Does anyone have any experience with Burris Euro Diamonds? And do they even compare to Swarvoskis? Which ones would you buy? Also wondering if there is a big difference between a 10 year old pair of Swarvoskis and brand new one's due to technological improvements? As you can probably tell, I don't have a ton of experience with high end optics so just about any advice you could give me would be useful.
ruffryder1221 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-15-2012 | 08:00 PM
  #2  
Sheridan's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
From:
Default

"...........I would probably never consider dropping $2000 on a pair of new Swarovskis, but $850 sound like a great price to me." Ruff


Me too !


Quality will last for generations.


Should have added; all my rifle scopes are Burris, binos & range finder are Nikon (with my money, I'll live with that)

Last edited by Sheridan; 12-06-2012 at 07:11 PM.
Sheridan is offline  
Reply
Old 11-15-2012 | 08:51 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: North Dakota
Default

Thanks for the reply, and the great Abe Lincoln quote!
ruffryder1221 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-16-2012 | 06:33 AM
  #4  
halfbakedi420's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,894
Likes: 0
From: central and east texas
Default

mainly you pay for shipping and tax on swarovski...burris makes nice glass.
halfbakedi420 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-2012 | 07:08 AM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
From:
Default

I use a set of 8x40 mm Swarovski SLC's that are 8 years old. Drop dead clear and concise. The 56 mm shuld should provide excellent low light performance and the 8X is plenty for glassing several hundred yards. I am not familiar with Burris' binos.
Mojotex is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.