Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Outdoor Gear > Optics
40mm vs. 50mm obj. lens >

40mm vs. 50mm obj. lens

Community
Optics Quality optics are a must-have for any serious hunter. Discuss them here.

40mm vs. 50mm obj. lens

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-18-2012, 05:33 PM
  #1  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
coolbrze0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 1,921
Default 40mm vs. 50mm obj. lens

Word on the street is that the larger the obj. lens, the more light the scope transmits. I also hear that the dia. of the tube makes a difference. W/ that being said, what's better, a 40 or 50mm obj. lens on a 1" dia. scope tube? I'm thinking of a new Leupold VX3, either the 3.5-10x40 or 50 or the VX3 4.5-14x40 or 50. When would you want a 40mm vs. 50mm & vice versa?
coolbrze0 is offline  
Old 10-18-2012, 06:05 PM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 3,516
Default

I like 40mm objectives it allows better head alignment for myself. If I was shooting long range I would go for a 30mm tube, for more verticle adjustment. Good luck.
handloader1 is offline  
Old 10-18-2012, 11:23 PM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 1,778
Default

Plans for the said scope?
Tundra10 is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 01:49 AM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
coolbrze0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 1,921
Default

Whitetail deer & pronghorn antelope, out to 400 yds. (most shots w/in 150 yds.) Mounted on Win. Mod 70 .270
coolbrze0 is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 03:12 AM
  #5  
Spike
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DGO, CO
Posts: 52
Default

Dont go higher than the 3.5-10 magnification. For shots that close you dont need to have the scope set past 5 anyways. I think a 2-7x40 is a great option. If you are constantly taking shots at dawn or dusk than a 50mm objective might help but most likely you wont see a difference in the 40 to 50 except in price
lak2004 is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 06:18 AM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
WV Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Virginia / West Virginia
Posts: 4,906
Default

Agree that 3.5-10 would be perfect. I actually have a 50mm leupold, and it does have great light transmission early and late. It was slightly better than the 40mm leupold I replaced, but not neccessarily needed. Both were alot better than lesser scopes for sure.
WV Hunter is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 08:51 AM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clermont Florida U.S.
Posts: 4,970
Default

The only advantage I see for the 50mm (+) objectives is: The exit pupil can be a bit higher at higher magnification. In other words, in order to achieve a desirable EP, the 50mm may be able to be used at slightly higher magnification levels than a 40mm lens.

I prefer 40-42 mm objectives for most hunting applications...as long as the glass is great with good coatings. Most 50+ units are heavier and seem more bulky to me.
bugsNbows is offline  
Old 10-20-2012, 04:16 AM
  #8  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
coolbrze0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 1,921
Default

Will prob. stick w/ the 3.5-10x40 as 50mm I'll need to to mount high rings wont I?
coolbrze0 is offline  
Old 10-20-2012, 08:47 AM
  #9  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clermont Florida U.S.
Posts: 4,970
Default

Originally Posted by coolbrze0
Will prob. stick w/ the 3.5-10x40 as 50mm I'll need to to mount high rings wont I?
50+ mm objective scopes often times need high rings and may hinder good cheek weld and/or constant, repeatable sight picture alignment.
bugsNbows is offline  
Old 10-20-2012, 07:00 PM
  #10  
Spike
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Georgetown Delaware
Posts: 43
Default

Cheek weld.....gotta have that! You cant shoot without drooling/groping your gun? Nothing like absorbing recoil with your face. Just saying.....
Flatland Slugger is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.