Weaver vx Leopold Fixed power
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Looking at fixed 4X scope for my son's new Marlin 30-30. Leopold has one and Weaver also makes one. I know leopold has a good reputation. How are weaver scopes? Their rings have a good rep and the Weaver costs a little less so if they make pretty good glass I may go with that but would like to hear what you think. Any other suggestions for a fixed 4x scope? Also, marlin sells a scope mount rail with rings, only about $16.00 that is made to fit this gun. Anyone know if it isgood or would you suggest another. All input appreciated.
#5
Typical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: Delaware OH USA
ORIGINAL: glockman55
No comparison, Leupold in my opinion is much better.
No comparison, Leupold in my opinion is much better.
#6
ORIGINAL: nksmfamjp
Why? My experience with Leupold says color rendition is not good and always has a slight amber or yellow tint.
ORIGINAL: glockman55
No comparison, Leupold in my opinion is much better.
No comparison, Leupold in my opinion is much better.
#7
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
ORIGINAL: glockman55
It's just my opinion, But I have never heard or seen any color distortion with Leupold. Mine areas clear as the day I bought them. I hope you sent back your discoloerd Luppy back to the factory.
ORIGINAL: nksmfamjp
Why? My experience with Leupold says color rendition is not good and always has a slight amber or yellow tint.
ORIGINAL: glockman55
No comparison, Leupold in my opinion is much better.
No comparison, Leupold in my opinion is much better.
#8
Typical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: Delaware OH USA
I thought it was an individual scope issue also. I probably looked at 20 Leupy's at 5 stores, several outside. I couldn't notice it without a Burris or a Sightron for comparison. I'm sure it is different coatings. To me naked eye coloration and Sightron or Burris wwas much closer to the naked eye. I'm sure it has to do with my color perception also. To me rose tinting in glasses gives a much more real or live color rendition. Yellow glasses gives me a brighter sensation, but with less contrast.
BTW. . .It could be me. My wife says I can't pick out a matching outfit to save my life!
BTW. . .It could be me. My wife says I can't pick out a matching outfit to save my life!
#9
Fork Horn
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Hamiltucky, OH
I was down to Sightron & Zeiss for my Whelen, & went with the Zeiss due to a longer tube length. I didn't want to have to use a rail, or ring extensions, on a 700.
IIRC, the Sightron was going for $174.00 - that's just a crazy-good deal for that quality of optics.
FC
IIRC, the Sightron was going for $174.00 - that's just a crazy-good deal for that quality of optics.
FC
#10
Fork Horn
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From:
Spruilldog:
I too have a Marlin .30-30, andmounted on it aLeupold VX-1 2-7x32 about six or seven years ago. I beleive that their 4X fixed is about the same size -- I usually just leave my scope on 3x or so. I love that combo. There's plenty of eye relief,and it'sa clear, rugged, and dependable scope. I mounted mine with a one piece Leupold base, and low rings. I don't have much familiarity with the Weavers, so I can't help you there.
I too have a Marlin .30-30, andmounted on it aLeupold VX-1 2-7x32 about six or seven years ago. I beleive that their 4X fixed is about the same size -- I usually just leave my scope on 3x or so. I love that combo. There's plenty of eye relief,and it'sa clear, rugged, and dependable scope. I mounted mine with a one piece Leupold base, and low rings. I don't have much familiarity with the Weavers, so I can't help you there.


