BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200
#1
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Muskegon,Michigan
Posts: 407
BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200
is the bushnell elite 4200, a better scope than the burris FFII's I was also told that the one in. tube will only let in a maximum light of 44mm. I was told that I should by a 30mm,tube scope if I want a 50mm objective or I was told I would be wasting my money because the light transmission in the 1inch tube would be a maximum of 44mm.
#2
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 318
RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200
I don't know about the Buris Fullfield II's or the Bushnell Elites,but I know about the Burris Euro-Diamand. It has the 30mm tube. Mine is a 2.5x10x44mm with the Ballistic Plex retical. I have it mount on my Remington 700xcr in 270wsm.I am really happy with it. It give plenty of light and cyrstal clear.I have heard alot ofbad mouthingon the Fullfield II.
#5
RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200
I think bushnell has unfair advantage because the elite is best in bushnell line while burris top of the line would be black diamond or at least sig series. Compare apples to apples instead of apples to oranges.
#6
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Muskegon,Michigan
Posts: 407
RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200
stalkingbear,do they make a 30mm tube in the FFII's or do you have to buy the signature series to 30mm tube,one of my biggest qeustions was also on the light transmission,I wanted yo buy the FFII in the 3x9x50mm with a 1inch. tube,I was told the 50mm with one in. tube would only let in the light capacity of a 44mm with a 1in. tube I was told to get the full performance out of the 50mm I needed to get the 30mm tube but the price goes way higher to get the 30mm tube that was one of the qeustions of the 4200 being a better scope because it had the 30mm tube.
#7
RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200
Burris don't to my limited knowledge make a fullfield 2 in a 30mm maintube scope. Humans have a pupil that on average expands to around 5mm in low light and 7mm in total darkness so all you need is 5mm exit pupil-anything bigger isn't needed and is uneccecary. For almost all normal hunting situations a 1" tube is all you need. To figure out how what the exit pupil on a scope,divide power into lens size mm. As in 8x into 40mm will have a 5mm exit pupil. Exit pupil in a scope is how big the scope image is.
#8
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Muskegon,Michigan
Posts: 407
RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200
stalkingbear,I know that your a gun smith and know one has actually answered my one critical qeustion about the 1in. tube if I buy a 50mm objective is it a waste of money I was told that the 1in. tube would only let in a maximum of 44mm of light transmission is this true...........Ted.
#9
RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200
Bucksnort-I honestly don't know about light transmission with a 1" tube vs a 30mm tube. The person to ask would be bigcountry as he works in the industry and has forgotton more about the techinal side of scopes than I'll ever learn-same way I am on guns. I'm sorry I can't help ya more. I suggest you send bigcountry a pm and ask him.
#10
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ponce de Leon Florida USA
Posts: 10,079
RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200
ORIGINAL: bucksnortinted
timbercruiser,have you used the burris fullfield II's if so could you explain why the 4200 is better,I sure would appreciate it.............Ted.
timbercruiser,have you used the burris fullfield II's if so could you explain why the 4200 is better,I sure would appreciate it.............Ted.
www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1610&PN=1