Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Outdoor Gear > Optics
 BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200 >

BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200

Community
Optics Quality optics are a must-have for any serious hunter. Discuss them here.

BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-01-2007, 11:26 AM
  #1  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Muskegon,Michigan
Posts: 407
Default BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200

is the bushnell elite 4200, a better scope than the burris FFII's I was also told that the one in. tube will only let in a maximum light of 44mm. I was told that I should by a 30mm,tube scope if I want a 50mm objective or I was told I would be wasting my money because the light transmission in the 1inch tube would be a maximum of 44mm.
bucksnortinted is offline  
Old 09-01-2007, 12:52 PM
  #2  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 318
Default RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200

I don't know about the Buris Fullfield II's or the Bushnell Elites,but I know about the Burris Euro-Diamand. It has the 30mm tube. Mine is a 2.5x10x44mm with the Ballistic Plex retical. I have it mount on my Remington 700xcr in 270wsm.I am really happy with it. It give plenty of light and cyrstal clear.I have heard alot ofbad mouthingon the Fullfield II.
700xcr is offline  
Old 09-01-2007, 03:22 PM
  #3  
Boone & Crockett
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ponce de Leon Florida USA
Posts: 10,079
Default RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200

4200 is the best.
timbercruiser is offline  
Old 09-01-2007, 06:41 PM
  #4  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Muskegon,Michigan
Posts: 407
Default RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200

timbercruiser,have you used the burris fullfield II's if so could you explain why the 4200 is better,I sure would appreciate it.............Ted.
bucksnortinted is offline  
Old 09-01-2007, 07:24 PM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
stalkingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Ky
Posts: 2,867
Default RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200

I think bushnell has unfair advantage because the elite is best in bushnell line while burris top of the line would be black diamond or at least sig series. Compare apples to apples instead of apples to oranges.
stalkingbear is offline  
Old 09-01-2007, 07:55 PM
  #6  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Muskegon,Michigan
Posts: 407
Default RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200

stalkingbear,do they make a 30mm tube in the FFII's or do you have to buy the signature series to 30mm tube,one of my biggest qeustions was also on the light transmission,I wanted yo buy the FFII in the 3x9x50mm with a 1inch. tube,I was told the 50mm with one in. tube would only let in the light capacity of a 44mm with a 1in. tube I was told to get the full performance out of the 50mm I needed to get the 30mm tube but the price goes way higher to get the 30mm tube that was one of the qeustions of the 4200 being a better scope because it had the 30mm tube.
bucksnortinted is offline  
Old 09-02-2007, 03:31 AM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
stalkingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Ky
Posts: 2,867
Default RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200

Burris don't to my limited knowledge make a fullfield 2 in a 30mm maintube scope. Humans have a pupil that on average expands to around 5mm in low light and 7mm in total darkness so all you need is 5mm exit pupil-anything bigger isn't needed and is uneccecary. For almost all normal hunting situations a 1" tube is all you need. To figure out how what the exit pupil on a scope,divide power into lens size mm. As in 8x into 40mm will have a 5mm exit pupil. Exit pupil in a scope is how big the scope image is.
stalkingbear is offline  
Old 09-02-2007, 05:51 AM
  #8  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Muskegon,Michigan
Posts: 407
Default RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200

stalkingbear,I know that your a gun smith and know one has actually answered my one critical qeustion about the 1in. tube if I buy a 50mm objective is it a waste of money I was told that the 1in. tube would only let in a maximum of 44mm of light transmission is this true...........Ted.
bucksnortinted is offline  
Old 09-02-2007, 08:27 AM
  #9  
Nontypical Buck
 
stalkingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Ky
Posts: 2,867
Default RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200

Bucksnort-I honestly don't know about light transmission with a 1" tube vs a 30mm tube. The person to ask would be bigcountry as he works in the industry and has forgotton more about the techinal side of scopes than I'll ever learn-same way I am on guns. I'm sorry I can't help ya more. I suggest you send bigcountry a pm and ask him.
stalkingbear is offline  
Old 09-02-2007, 08:36 AM
  #10  
Boone & Crockett
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ponce de Leon Florida USA
Posts: 10,079
Default RE: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200

ORIGINAL: bucksnortinted

timbercruiser,have you used the burris fullfield II's if so could you explain why the 4200 is better,I sure would appreciate it.............Ted.
Go to this link and take time to read it. There are a lot of optics professionals on there. They own and use a lot of scopes, know how they work and why. Most compare the 4200 with the Conquest. No I don't have a Burris, although I do have a 4200. I have shot a Burris a few times.

www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1610&PN=1
timbercruiser is offline  


Quick Reply: BURRIS FFII OR BUSHNELL ELITE 4200


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.