I think they would jump at that offer adams.Open land is getting harder to find so they would be willing to pay.
From our standpoint it would be a bad idea because it would open the door to other groups and more useage.Which takes us back to the pitt-robertson fund.If the PGC would allow more useage they would lose some of this money which is generated by the hunters.

Thank goodness for these regs. I can easlily see the PGC looking to such sources to solve their money woes and it would be a start down a sippery slope.