|
RE: Hunters need to discern between fact, fiction in deer management debate
Killed 5 this year. Not trying to pick a fight with anyone. Not attempting to prove my hunting prowess, I didnt kill a buck. They were killed in 2B and 2D where there are too many deer.
Shot em all legally, ethically, and helped support the deer management plan:D |
RE: Hunters need to discern between fact, fiction in deer management debate
ORIGINAL: USPROUD looks to me like t in pa 3 is trying his best to start a fight why else would he boast about killing 4 deers to someone that posts about lack of deers? Why is it with only 17 posts you feel the need to go around posting about how everyone is always trying to "pick a fight". Sounds to me like you just want to get people to start arguing. |
RE: Hunters need to discern between fact, fiction in deer management debate
Other hunters, hunters just like all of us are the ones pulling the trigger. btw... took 4 deer last season. looks to me like t in pa 3 is trying his best to start a fight why else would he boast about killing 4 deers to someone that posts about lack of deers? Talk about reading into something... sheesh! |
RE: Hunters need to discern between fact, fiction in deer management debate
and try to make yourself look like a big shot using Alpha hunter name
|
RE: Hunters need to discern between fact, fiction in deer management debate
I guess you missed the "Alpha" hunter classificastions while on duty. Maybe you need to research it a little. Not my term but I fit the description.
|
RE: Hunters need to discern between fact, fiction in deer management debate
Mark Nale is absolutely right in his assessment of the deer debate. We have a few uninformed, misgueded , vocal, anti establishment "hunters" with chips on their shoulders that are not going to stop until the "government" steps in to squelch this "uprising" We have to ask our selves as hunters, " dO we really want this"? BE CAREFUL FOR WHAT YOU WISH FOR GENTLEMAN, IT WILL COME BACK TO BITE ALL OF US!
|
RE: Hunters need to discern between fact, fiction in deer management debate
Three-tiered antler restrictions to improve the ratio of adult bucks to does: It is working; |
RE: Hunters need to discern between fact, fiction in deer management debate
1
Since when do we have a three tiered AR plan. I thought we had areas with 3 pts. and areas with 4 pt. restriction AR's do not apply to juniors, handicapped and military,so they are not part of the AR plan.. I count 3. |
RE: Hunters need to discern between fact, fiction in deer management debate
slight correction here. Juniors, military etc only have to comply with the OLD AR's The fact is , the author was blowing smoke. |
RE: Hunters need to discern between fact, fiction in deer management debate
Wrong again. The 3" spike rule was never referrred to as AR . and the 3 " spike rule is not considered to be an AR plan in any other state. The fact is , the author was blowing smoke. Page 58, 2004 Pa digest: Statewide, all junior license holders, disabled hunters with a permit to use a vehicle and resident active duty US armed services personnel will be able to abide by the former antler restrictions of one antler of three or more inches in length or one antler with at least two points |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:45 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.