Washington Times "Arming Democrats"
02-13-2002 | 03:05 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Williamsport Md USA
Washington Times "Arming Democrats"
http://washtimes.com/national/inbeltway.htm
Arming Democrats
Could it be that Rep. Nita M. Lowey of New York, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, outspoken leader of gun-control legislation and frequent critic of the National Rifle Association, is hosting a pheasant shoot?
"Please join us for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairmen's Council Pheasant Shoot with the Honorable John D. Dingell at Whistling Hill, Boonsboro, Md., Monday March 11," reads the invitation bearing Mrs. Lowey's name.
"Dogs, guides and 12- and 20-gauge shells will be provided. All participants are expected to provide their own shotguns."
But wait, what about Democratic Party faithful who don't own shotguns?
Not to worry, says Mrs. Lowey, the DCCC's Nicole Mizirl is making arrangements to arm the gunless Democrats. Just be sure to "please bring your $2,000 registration fee to the event or have it sent to the DCCC no later than March 8th."
Is this legal?
"It is imperative that you obtain a hunting license," says the DCCC chairman, "purchased at any sporting-goods store, including Dick's Sporting Goods or Wal-Mart."
What should Democrats wear on pheasant shoots?
"You should plan on wearing jeans or tough trousers," Mrs. Lowey recommends.
Dems with guns
Contrary to popular belief, not all liberals view the Second Amendment, which guarantees the right to keep and bear arms, as outdated — not even the dean of House Democrats, every liberal's liberal, Rep. John D. Dingell.
"Like Martin Luther, who said he didn't think the devil ought to have all the good music, I say that criminals ought not to have all the guns," the senior Michigan Democrat once observed.
In fact, when a Republican of all people — Rep. Henry J. Hyde of Illinois — tried in 1999 to impose a 72-hour criminal background check at gun shows, it was Mr. Dingell who cried fowl, er, foul.
The Democrat not only argued that 24 hours was sufficient time to sniff out a criminal, he enlisted other leading Democrats — Robert E. "Bud" Cramer of Alabama, Charles W. Stenholm of Texas, Chris John of Louisiana, James L. Oberstar of Minnesota and John Tanner of Tennessee — to sign a letter stating that the three-day waiting period proposed by the Republican violated law-abiding citizens' "Second Amendment Rights."
It so happened that toward the end of President Clinton's second term, Mr. Dingell had almost single-handedly killed whatever chances Mr. Clinton and his own Democratic Party had at passing broader gun control. That came as no surprise to Mr. Clinton.
After all, it was a bitterly cold morning in 1993, shortly after arriving in Washington from Arkansas, that two Democrats handed Mr. Clinton a hunting license, earplugs and a semiautomatic shotgun and took him duck hunting on Maryland's Slaughter Creek. One was Rep. Bill Brewster of Oklahoma, who after leaving Congress became a National Rifle Association board member. The other was Mr. Dingell.
This shoot will be about 15 minutes from my house, who all's going?
Arming Democrats
Could it be that Rep. Nita M. Lowey of New York, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, outspoken leader of gun-control legislation and frequent critic of the National Rifle Association, is hosting a pheasant shoot?
"Please join us for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairmen's Council Pheasant Shoot with the Honorable John D. Dingell at Whistling Hill, Boonsboro, Md., Monday March 11," reads the invitation bearing Mrs. Lowey's name.
"Dogs, guides and 12- and 20-gauge shells will be provided. All participants are expected to provide their own shotguns."
But wait, what about Democratic Party faithful who don't own shotguns?
Not to worry, says Mrs. Lowey, the DCCC's Nicole Mizirl is making arrangements to arm the gunless Democrats. Just be sure to "please bring your $2,000 registration fee to the event or have it sent to the DCCC no later than March 8th."
Is this legal?
"It is imperative that you obtain a hunting license," says the DCCC chairman, "purchased at any sporting-goods store, including Dick's Sporting Goods or Wal-Mart."
What should Democrats wear on pheasant shoots?
"You should plan on wearing jeans or tough trousers," Mrs. Lowey recommends.
Dems with guns
Contrary to popular belief, not all liberals view the Second Amendment, which guarantees the right to keep and bear arms, as outdated — not even the dean of House Democrats, every liberal's liberal, Rep. John D. Dingell.
"Like Martin Luther, who said he didn't think the devil ought to have all the good music, I say that criminals ought not to have all the guns," the senior Michigan Democrat once observed.
In fact, when a Republican of all people — Rep. Henry J. Hyde of Illinois — tried in 1999 to impose a 72-hour criminal background check at gun shows, it was Mr. Dingell who cried fowl, er, foul.
The Democrat not only argued that 24 hours was sufficient time to sniff out a criminal, he enlisted other leading Democrats — Robert E. "Bud" Cramer of Alabama, Charles W. Stenholm of Texas, Chris John of Louisiana, James L. Oberstar of Minnesota and John Tanner of Tennessee — to sign a letter stating that the three-day waiting period proposed by the Republican violated law-abiding citizens' "Second Amendment Rights."
It so happened that toward the end of President Clinton's second term, Mr. Dingell had almost single-handedly killed whatever chances Mr. Clinton and his own Democratic Party had at passing broader gun control. That came as no surprise to Mr. Clinton.
After all, it was a bitterly cold morning in 1993, shortly after arriving in Washington from Arkansas, that two Democrats handed Mr. Clinton a hunting license, earplugs and a semiautomatic shotgun and took him duck hunting on Maryland's Slaughter Creek. One was Rep. Bill Brewster of Oklahoma, who after leaving Congress became a National Rifle Association board member. The other was Mr. Dingell.
This shoot will be about 15 minutes from my house, who all's going?
02-14-2002 | 12:48 PM
#5
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 0
From: Gambrills Md US
RE: Washington Times "Arming Democrats"
It's just a bit ironic that the money collected from the hunt will fund the campaigns of Democrats who would like nothing more than to outlaw hunting. Kind of like hunters' license fees and Robertson Pittman money funneled to anti's (because of democrats misappropriating the money) who want to outlaw hunting.
Even Gore, though not saying he would infringe on hunters, expressed his dislike with handguns, and could very well impose a $10,000 per year "gun" license on hunters' rifles and shotguns. That way, he could get hunters' votes, and screw them shortly after the election, saying "I said I wouldn't outlaw hunting, I never said I wouldn't impose a heavy registration fee to own hunting guns."
Then he could give the proceeds of the $10,000 per gun, per year registration fee to the terrorists for whom he has a soft spot in his heart, saying they attacked the WTC because of poverty, even though they were from well-to-do families.
A bit of a tangent, but you get the idea.
Edited by - DougMd on 02/14/2002 13:51:43
Even Gore, though not saying he would infringe on hunters, expressed his dislike with handguns, and could very well impose a $10,000 per year "gun" license on hunters' rifles and shotguns. That way, he could get hunters' votes, and screw them shortly after the election, saying "I said I wouldn't outlaw hunting, I never said I wouldn't impose a heavy registration fee to own hunting guns."
Then he could give the proceeds of the $10,000 per gun, per year registration fee to the terrorists for whom he has a soft spot in his heart, saying they attacked the WTC because of poverty, even though they were from well-to-do families.
A bit of a tangent, but you get the idea.
Edited by - DougMd on 02/14/2002 13:51:43
02-14-2002 | 02:30 PM
#6
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Industry Pa. USA
RE: Washington Times "Arming Democrats"
How about a link to this story?
"Even Gore, though not saying he would infringe on hunters, expressed his dislike with handguns, and could very well impose a $10,000 per year "gun" license on hunters' rifles and shotguns."
"Even Gore, though not saying he would infringe on hunters, expressed his dislike with handguns, and could very well impose a $10,000 per year "gun" license on hunters' rifles and shotguns."
