There is not going to be any medicaid when that time comes because there won't be any money to pay for it. People will be forced to take care of their loved ones instead of throwing them in nursing homes.

Still doesnt make the coal companies the ones after medicare. As usual a half truth alot of conjecture and the sky is falling.

You seem to know even less about the judicial system and how it works than you do about wildlife management.:D

Is there anything you are not an expert on?
Maybe they could afford to care for themselves and their family if they didn't
have the government taking 1/2 their money to pay for others.
Why not have all our money should go straight to the government and let them pay all the bills?
Our country existed for a long time without dumping those who needed some help in a publically supported warehouse. It's called family and community.

maybe RWJ can learn a few things about how things work.
i was in supreme court in philly and saw it all for 30 years.
you are right. USP lost from start not because of expert witness but because the deck is stacked against anyone who takes on the establishments.

been there ,saw that for 30 years.

Pa. voters got sick and tired of the establishment last election. Guess they getting tired pay for these entitlements.;)

could be.every 8 years usually partys change.now its republicans turn.
low voter turnout is one reason.in my area it was around 36% voted. we used to have average of 70% voting.

YOUNG PEOPLE DONT SEEM TO CARE.old or older farts vote.property taxes are wrong.it should be on your INCOME not your home.you should see the wealthy and upper middle class give ole sproul a dirty look on that one when i speak at county meetings.:)

Your right, property taxes are wrong. Why should a person with no kids but owns a lot of property pay more in school taxes than some one with several kids in the school system paying little or no school taxes? The system is way screwed up, The people receiving the lions share of entitlements should be paying the bulk of the taxes, but they pay little or no taxes. As for the USP, another entitlement crowd, expects the PGC to provide every hunter with a deer every year.:nonono2:

Paying taxes for education should have nothing to do with how many or whether or not you have children. EVERYONE benefits from education--their own and the education of others so everyone should bear the burden. We have a system that requires that the more you are able to pay, the more you should pay. It's pretty hard to make an argument that that philosophy is wrong. There may or may not be a direct correlation between how much property one owns and their ability to pay and I wouldn't oppose education taxes be linked to income rather than property value but these are details about how to institute a progressive tax, not a philosophical disagreement.

GPS collars on antlerless deer in WMU unit 2G (of which Clinton County is a part of) showed that only 4% were being killed on public land. Since it takes a 30% harvest of the total antlerless population to stabilize it's growth, the herd in 2G is very likely growing.

You can find this and other information in a webinar from Kip Adams, a Certified Wildlife Biologists and QDMA's Director of Outreach and Education for the Northern US. This webinar was hosted by Penn State's Natural Resources Extension. The link is: http://rnrext.cas.psu.edu/PAForestWe...sseminars.html

I find it amazing that Kip actually believes the survival rates for deer in 2G. Eveland used the survival rates from these flawed studies to try and prove that the PGC harvest data was flawed and all he proved was that his analysis was flawed.