More complaints on the PGC
#61
Fork Horn
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 171
prior to that there were "Deer Damage Area" farms could enroll in that allowed anyone hunting that area to kill doe during buck season. It started as only allowing doe to be killed the second week of rifle buck season,2 yrs later it went to the entire buck season
#62
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
"I'd say nice try, but it's actually kind of pathetic. That last post makes absolutely zero sense."
" To anyone who reads all the drivel from the point where you made the false 50 year claim,"
"in spite of the smoke and mirrors."
Well what do you know? Like being wrong on all 3 things you leapt into last night, today already you have another trifecta.
#63
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
Statewide it was 1988 according to pgc.
But then someone is liable to jump in screaming wrong it was 1932 for 15 pages, so i better post the link LOL: http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal...o_1989_CI.html
But then someone is liable to jump in screaming wrong it was 1932 for 15 pages, so i better post the link LOL: http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal...o_1989_CI.html
#64
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,262
The calculated harvest was implemenetd in 1986.Prior to that,it was a reported harvest.
#66
the lie.........
Hmmm. Hardly say thats relavent when a couple of our recent harvests were at FIFTY (not 15) year lows.
As for the dates for bonus tags and seperate ear tags etc, further checking supports the post that DougE just made. I stand corrected on that part of the issue.
#67
#69
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
Btb, ive already addressed EVERYTHING. And youve added nothing, so the facts still stand and thats not gonna change. You leapt in without looking and you stuck your foot in your mouth. Ive shown everything exactly as is, and you link shows nothing other than your attempt to confuse the issues thinking noone will read all these posts and look into and therefore know better... My suggestion is to know what you are talking about BEFORE getting involved. Not after you're arguement has already been shredded.
Gee. imagine that! lmao. And if i or bb would have said the exact same thing, you'd have made 50 more arguing posts that you werent wrong. Maybe i'll just pm doug with my replies to you to post from now on! lol.
Thats another lie. While i have pointed out clear mistruths made by you, ive not once called you or anyone else a liar. I address the statement made, not the person. But a fabrication is a fabrication and should be pointed out as such. Quit making them and I'll stop pointing it out.
"As for the dates for bonus tags and seperate ear tags etc, further checking supports the post that DougE just made."
Since you like the word liar
Last edited by Cornelius08; 03-16-2010 at 11:04 AM.
#70
Btb, ive already addressed EVERYTHING. And youve added nothing, so the facts still stand and thats not gonna change. You leapt in without looking and you stuck your foot in your mouth. Ive shown everything exactly as is, and you link shows nothing other than your attempt to confuse the issues thinking noone will read all these posts and look into and therefore know better... My suggestion is to know what you are talking about BEFORE getting involved. Not after you're arguement has already been shredded.
So lets look at the harvests calculated since 1986
lowest in that time 300,004 in 1986
second lowest since that time 335,850
highest in that time 517,529 in 2002
lowest since HR 323,070 in 2007
second lowest since HR 335,850 in 2008
As for hunter success lets only use years since 1988 when bonus tags came in
most recent antlered deer hunter success rate 17% in 2008
most recent antlerless deer hunter success rate 26% in 2008
best antlered deer hunter success rate in the 80's 17% avg 16%
best antlered deer hunter success rate in the 2000's 24% avg 19%
Antlerless deer hunter success rates in 33% in 88 and 26% in 2008
average antlerless hunter success rates in the 80's 32%
and in the 2000's the average was 31%
While we have less deer we also have less hunters. Successs rates overall havent changed much.
The numbers speak for themselves. Deer hunters now have a slightly better chance of harvesting a buck and a slightly lesser chance of harvesting a doe.