Feel free to post the screen names of those active members who support the PGC DMP. Then post the names of the PGC supporters that can support their position with independent data. You can't do it because there is no data that supports the PGC DMP and the audit proved that!!!

I support the DMAP program 100%! I believe that any landowner should be able to shoot each and every deer that resides on their property or the land they control (as long as the meat doesnt go to waste) and by any means nec. Pike

Im right down the middle on the issue of dmap. I think its being used a bit too heavy handedly in the s.f's. On the other hand i think its a good idea to give landowners the option as another tool along with redtag depredation killing etc..., then if they feel they have too many deer, they only have themselves to blame, and shouldnt whine about the allocations that effect the entire unit.

Do you agree with DCNR DMAPPING old growth forests or bio-reserve areas?

I agree. And there are also overly vocal fellow hunter bashers who nod in agreement to everything ever said or done by pgc. They also have a tendency to often avoid the truth of the matters.

Mighty funny coming you btb. Nothing but more personal attack.

And, it doesn't take very long to sort them out either.

With some its every single day....

But we are supposed to "smile and wave".....

I dont have a problem with it in those limited "sanctuary" type areas.

OH! I think we had a slight misunderstanding.. I was going by Jeffs Post, and thought we were talking about DMAP. You meant the deer management program.

I know very very few support the hr end of it. Even the couple vocal proponents on the program admit it needs tweaked, and even on biased boards like pgc the polls tell the tale of pgc woe and little support. So it isnt like much of anyone really supports it as is. Though some of us know that more significant changes are needed than just adding 2 more dpsm by cutting the allocation by 1k in one or two units! lol.