Whats wrong with the gamelands?
#101
ORIGINAL: bowtruck
I thought we were listening to the deer and deer experts
BB i thought you wanted more deer all this time sayiing the habitat could support more?
Thought doug,btb was part of the pgc brownnosers
Did you switch stance or did i misunderstand you? cause it sounds like you agree with pgc experts now?
I thought we were listening to the deer and deer experts
BB i thought you wanted more deer all this time sayiing the habitat could support more?
Thought doug,btb was part of the pgc brownnosers
Did you switch stance or did i misunderstand you? cause it sounds like you agree with pgc experts now?

#102
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Did you switch stance or did i misunderstand you? cause it sounds like you agree with pgc experts now?
#103
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Maybe because the deer are now in line with the habitat which would back up my claims that the habitat is starting to recover.Hmmm,maybe these experts actually do know what they're doing
#106
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: 3c pa
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
I believe the PGC stats but I don't believe the PGC experts who claim that forest health is poor even though herd health is very good,even though 2G is 90% forested. Therefore , even though the herd is healthy the PGC claims they have to keep the herd at 8-9 OWD PSM even though the herd is as healthy as anywhere in the state.
Did you switch stance or did i misunderstand you? cause it sounds like you agree with pgc experts now?
bluebird2
titleAndStar(2575,0,false,false,"","")
Life Member

[align=center][/align]
Posts: 2575
Joined: 4/4/2008
Status: online
[blockquote]quote:
ORIGINAL: bawanajim
[blockquote]quote:
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
So despite your propaganda , the fact is 2G has not been subject to high DDs from the 70s as you claimed. The fact is that 2G has been at or below its goal for ten years , but forest health is still rated poor by the PGC despite your claims to the contrary.
[/blockquote]
So your answer to this poor habitat is to add more deer to the area? Brilliant, just simple brilliant.
[/blockquote]
Well you certainly aren't very brilliant since the deer in 2G are telling us the habitat is just fine. But I guess you would rather listen to the propaganda spread by Doug and RSB rather than listening to the deer and the PGC xperts..
Why do you think 2G has the third highest productivity rate in the state if the habitat is so poor?
That was one sentence of bb
But I guess you would rather listen to the propaganda spread by Doug and RSB rather than listening to the deer and the PGC xperts..
I believe the PGC stats but I don't believe the PGC experts
That was another
Bluebird i dont understand what your point is. Thats kinda 2 conflicting sentences . Help a fool understand what you are trying to say
#107
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Dream on sport. Cutting the herd in half doubles the available food supply with no improvement in the habitat!!!
Dream on sport. Cutting the herd in half doubles the available food supply with no improvement in the habitat!!!

#108
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
You PA guys are the laughing stock of the country! How can one state have so many idiots begging for more deer than the land can handle? We got a few idiots like that here in the midwest but it sure seems like you have way more than your share!
#109
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: 3c pa
oh yeah well well we laugh at you for having so many big bucks.
We have many people that seem to know more than the experts.
It shouldnt be rocket science less deer= more food add up to healthier deer

We have many people that seem to know more than the experts.
It shouldnt be rocket science less deer= more food add up to healthier deer
#110
Banned
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
Im guessing audubon society ecoextremists arent dictating game management in the midwest.
I agree. Pa is the laughing stock of the nation. Fact of the matter is, it wasnt until econuts nonhunter friendly environmentalists took over our wildlife management agency.
I agree. Pa is the laughing stock of the nation. Fact of the matter is, it wasnt until econuts nonhunter friendly environmentalists took over our wildlife management agency.



.