Pennsylvania deer kills drop
#161
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
The 12 WMU's that declined, are they similar in terms of habiat makeup?
Can you explain why breeding rates would decrease in any WMU due to HR and ARs?
#162
Banned
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
The rates of decline vary. SOmedeclines were noticable, others very slight. But we should have been experiencing increases. Also considering the fact that the problem really isnt in one years data as far as the adult doe pregnancy rate, since its rate of decline is only a percent or two per year, but its the total decline and the trend. Small differences each year adding up.
Those wmus experiencing adult doe embryo declineson the07-08 report. 1A, 1B, 2A,2D,2F,3B,4A,4B,4C,4E,5C and 5D.
Id make a chart, but am feeling lazy today, and have a headachenot really inthe mood for all the typing.
Those wmus experiencing adult doe embryo declineson the07-08 report. 1A, 1B, 2A,2D,2F,3B,4A,4B,4C,4E,5C and 5D.
Id make a chart, but am feeling lazy today, and have a headachenot really inthe mood for all the typing.
#163
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
I have not had a chance to give the 07/08 report the time it deserves
#166
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
the report has been out for many months and the fact that you haven;t taken the time to read it in full explains why you don't know what you are talking about.
I have not had a chance to give the 07/08 report the time it deserves
Not that your post deserves a civil response but I'm gonna do my best. I have read through the report but not with particular scrutiny on the point that Corny brought up. I intend to look at it again in that light.
You've said you want the childish stuff to stop. Please pratice what you preach
#167
ORIGINAL: Cornelius08
The rates of decline vary. SOmedeclines were noticable, others very slight. But we should have been experiencing increases. Also considering the fact that the problem really isnt in one years data as far as the adult doe pregnancy rate, since its rate of decline is only a percent or two per year, but its the total decline and the trend. Small differences each year adding up.
Those wmus experiencing adult doe embryo declineson the07-08 report. 1A, 1B, 2A,2D,2F,3B,4A,4B,4C,4E,5C and 5D.
Id make a chart, but am feeling lazy today, and have a headachenot really inthe mood for all the typing.
The rates of decline vary. SOmedeclines were noticable, others very slight. But we should have been experiencing increases. Also considering the fact that the problem really isnt in one years data as far as the adult doe pregnancy rate, since its rate of decline is only a percent or two per year, but its the total decline and the trend. Small differences each year adding up.
Those wmus experiencing adult doe embryo declineson the07-08 report. 1A, 1B, 2A,2D,2F,3B,4A,4B,4C,4E,5C and 5D.
Id make a chart, but am feeling lazy today, and have a headachenot really inthe mood for all the typing.
Thanks for listing the WMU's. From the half of the state I'm familiar with, it seems that the declining WMU's are all over the charts as far as habitat type.
#168
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: 3c pa
i cant say hunters deserve a answer . It seems the pgc would be doing the right thing by giving a answer
A resonable rational answer is in the eye of the beholder some wont accept any answer and some will accept any answer
A resonable rational answer is in the eye of the beholder some wont accept any answer and some will accept any answer
#169
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
If you think my post violates the term of civil discourse, then you will never be able to participate in a discussion between mature adult PA hunters. If you haven't read and digested the contents of the 2008 AWR, then you really aren't qualified to participate in this discussion.
#170
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
If you think my post violates the term of civil discourse, then you will never be able to participate in a discussion between mature adult PA hunters. If you haven't read and digested the contents of the 2008 AWR, then you really aren't qualified to participate in this discussion.
If you think my post violates the term of civil discourse, then you will never be able to participate in a discussion between mature adult PA hunters. If you haven't read and digested the contents of the 2008 AWR, then you really aren't qualified to participate in this discussion.
I will not respond to this type of instigation. You areby no means an indispensible part of the discussion Cornelius answered my question. I thanked him. I intend to look at the report again with further scrutiny in this area. Perhaps the best solution is to invoke the red button again..........
showPicture("4/7/2009 6:11:07 PM",0,0,0,3388107,30)

bluebird2
This user is on your "block" list and the message has been blocked.
Click here to unblock this user and view this post.
[align=right][/align]

Report | Post #: 169


