Seems his education would qualify him,


[ul][*]
Ph.D. in Forest Resources Science, West Virginia University[/align][*]
M.S. in Wildlife Management, Pennsylvania State University[/align][*]
B.S. in Wildlife Science, Utah State University[/align][*]
Associate in Wildlife Technology, DuBois Campus, Pennsylvania State University[/align][/ul]

Calling Dr Gary Alt a "clown" kinda puts it all in perspective doesn't it.

One might think it would, but to be qualified one has to apply that knowledge to real life situations. But, Alt didn't know what our B/D ratio was before ARs or simply lied about it and he obviously didn't know the reason for late born fawns and the extended breeding window.

Sure does Jim. Of course lets not forget that Alt isn't the only wildlife profesional that doesn't measure up to [&:]birds Standards.

There's also Dr Kroll who [&:] tell us "doesn't understand his own research".

[&:]bird also claims that Charlie Alsheimer mismanages his property.

Of course, he's blasted Rosenberry too.

No wonder the [&:]bird and his lemmings are willing to jump on streets bandwagon and put a wildlife photographer (who by all information available hasn't worked in wildlife management in PA for 30 years) to the fore front as the one to audit the deer program.

Sounding more and more like desperation time for the naysayers isn't it?


As for all the "suspect" closed door secret meetings, I have obtained a snapshot ofsome of those who attended the meetings where Streets suggestion was discussed.......

Wrong again. I actually feel sorry for Dr. R. since he got stuck with the mess Alt created. As a result he is in a no win situation and can't even release the data on ARs or the breeding rates and DDs in each WMU. He is stuck with the job of damage control and it limits his ability to do the right thing.

OK we could argue semantics all day about what exact words ou said about Rosenberry and waht they were intended to mean. The plain and simple facts is the you have repeatedly attempted to discredit his work.

What is undisputable is that you have repeatedly dismissed many respected wildlife professionals and their work for one reason or another and have produced nothing in the way of evidence as to your qualifications to dispute the work of so many people who do this for a living.

On the other hand, an opinionated, biased, fairly obscure columnist suggests a photographer as the man to do the deer audit and you climb on board that bandwagon immediately

That is a flat out lie. You can't provide one example where I discredited the work of Dr. R. I have said he couldn't answer my questions and has failed to provide the data on ARs, but he definitely gives more honest answers than Alt and is even willing to admit when he doesn't have an answer.
No , I did not dismiss their work, I just questioned the conclusions they reached. I don't need any qualifications to question their work when I can provide research from other experts that prove I am right.

LMFAO !!!
blkpowder you are one funny guy!

Now I gotta explain to the wife why I busted out laughing so loud that I startled her darn near outta her seat.

[/quote]

LMFAO !!!
blkpowder you are one funny guy!

Now I gotta explain to the wife why I busted out laughing so loud that I startled her darn near outta her seat.
[/quote]
Tell your wife I sincerely apologize, for being half the reason she got startled.[/align]