RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

Yer right, its my bad, its the P.G.C.'s cooking you've been berating for untold years.

Silly me to think you've been complaining about no deer all this time. Hell I agree with you their cooking sucks.

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

I dunno they put out a few good recipes.... They've managed to take some scraps of leftoverhabitat, portioned it into WMU's mixed in liberal ladles of HR with healthy dollops of AR, mixed it all together, put on the burner for 6 years and and came up with.....
a Corny, Bluebird stew best served with coalcrackers

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

LMFAO

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

Of course some of the best cooking outcomes are the result of mistakes and the unintended consequences wind up being loved by many. For example....



BB[&:], not to be outdone, takes a couple pounds of PGC facts, puts them in a blender, cooks them his own secret way, seasons it with some spiced up personal stories and pops it into the HNI Northeast oven. It generates plenty of smoke there and when the other members finally get past the smoke and mirrors to retrieve the dish, and viola! out comes [&:]birds favorite meal.....

Toasted Crow sandwich
with a side of humble pie!

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

Just keep piling on the insults and then complain some more about the tone of the board in another thread. You admit to being a troll posting for no other reason than to start an argument and then you have the nerve to complain.

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

your rightbb naughty jim we should just ignore bb instead insulting him if we dont like what he has to say

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

You really shouldn't pick on our friends the birds and this little poem will tell you what could happen to you.

Little birdie in the sky
dropped some white wash in my eye
I was brave and I didn't cry
because I'm glad that cows can't fly

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

LOL! Have a good night CC!

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

And here is a news flash for you too.

The units that make up those four counties have had the highest buck harvests per square mile in the state over the past years when the number of record book entries declined in those counties. Therefore, the decline in book entries obviously isn’t from a lack of bucks being available. Since we have already seen that statewide the book entries are higher since 2001 then ever before in the history of deer harvests the decline in record book bucks being entered from those four counties can only mean that fewer of the bucks being harvested in those counties is book worthy or that people simply aren’t getting the smaller book bucks scored, which is what I suspect to the be the biggest factor.

Remember, as shown in my comments within your own post, I said fewer book bucks available. That is a long stretch from me saying there were fewer bucks available. Especially since, like I already said, those counties have had the highest buck harvests per square mile in the state for a long time.

You need to look at more of the facts and then take a few minutes to think things through toward a logical conclusion before you post your spinning yarns and posting nonsense that isn’t supported with any facts.

R.S. Bodenhorn

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

But the highest buck harvest rates means fewer buck survive to become old enough to become record book buck.

Could it be that the decrease in record book buck in 2B is due to the effects of high grading ,just like in Miss.?