HuntingNet.com Forums
Page 27 of 48
« First
17
25
26
27
28
29
37
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   Some nice bucks (pic) (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/287123-some-nice-bucks-pic.html)

livbucks 02-25-2009 04:47 PM
RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
I know the digital pics are so much better, but I have only been using a digital for a couple of years.
These are pics of pics andI was having a heck of a time photographing glossy photos.
I surely hope you don't mind me cropping out my Dad's and Son's faces??

livbucks 02-25-2009 04:50 PM
RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
This one was a true HOG!

bluebird2 02-25-2009 04:52 PM
RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
Wrong! Pure spin and you know it! It means that the very top end bucks didn't vary much as measured by antler score. The average quality was decreasing, however because the average came form far fewer bucks in the high end category. that would have meant far more small bucks percentage wise at those times.
You don't have a clue what you are talking about. the record book buck have nothing to do with the average buck in the herd. They are the exception to the rule and do not represent the avergae buck in the herd.
LOL!! I used your words. cant have it both ways sport!

That is pure unadulterated crap and you know it. once again you are a proven liar.

BTBowhunter 02-25-2009 05:23 PM
RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
ORIGINAL: bluebird2

Wrong! Pure spin and you know it! It means that the very top end bucks didn't vary much as measured by antler score. The average quality was decreasing, however because the average came form far fewer bucks in the high end category. that would have meant far more small bucks percentage wise at those times.
You don't have a clue what you are talking about. the record book buck have nothing to do with the average buck in the herd. They are the exception to the rule and do not represent the avergae buck in the herd.
LOL!! I used your words. cant have it both ways sport!

That is pure unadulterated crap and you know it. once again you are a proven liar.
Take a chill pill, take a deep breath and go back and read it. You said yourself the the herd had been reduced in your spin on RSB's post.
Maybe you wouldn't confuse yourself if you stuck to one story. Telling the truth is the easiest way to do that. When recalling what you said, it;s easy if there was only one version to remember.

Try it. It may be tough at first but I think you'll find it will reduce your stress level;)

BTBowhunter 02-25-2009 05:24 PM
RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
Very nice bucks Greg!

bluebird2 02-25-2009 05:38 PM
RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
What IS significant is that the immediate past two decades (and this one is not over yet) produced the two highest numbers of high quality bucks from (as you so adamantly claim) a smaller total population of deer.
That is what you posted and it was a flat out lie. During the past two decades the herd was an at all time high and i never claimed the highest number of high quality buck came from a smaller population. the simple fact is you lie to cover up your ignorance.

the outsider 02-25-2009 05:58 PM
RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
ORIGINAL: Matt / PA

WMU's 4B and 5B (me on the right) checkin' in!
(just because :))



I absolutely believe that 2G picture........I was basically called a liar earlier this year because a buddy and I spotted several P&Y quality bucks from the Sproul State forest one of which looked eerily similar to that one on the bottom right.
And it took us all of 1hr to find them on State forest! :D
Not to take away anything from your buck, but the rack on the left isawsome! Any other pictures of it?

BTBowhunter 02-25-2009 06:04 PM
RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
ORIGINAL: bluebird2

What IS significant is that the immediate past two decades (and this one is not over yet) produced the two highest numbers of high quality bucks from (as you so adamantly claim) a smaller total population of deer.
That is what you posted and it was a flat out lie. During the past two decades the herd was an at all time high and i never claimed the highest number of high quality buck came from a smaller population. the simple fact is you lie to cover up your ignorance.
Uh it was in response to your post containing these words....

As the herd was reduced from 1980 to the 1998 the average antler score decreased.
Want a little salt and pepper to help em go down?

bluebird2 02-25-2009 06:15 PM
RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
No , you are lying once again. you took a quote of RSB and attributed to me or you took a comment of mine about the population in 2g and attributed to the state wide herd. Which lie are you guilty of this time?

BTBowhunter 02-25-2009 06:33 PM
RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
Here it is LIAR The entire post as it apppears on the preceding page. I took the liberty of copying the whole thing including the header in case you decide to pull a the corny stunt of editing after the fact.

Oh, and here's the link to the page

http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/tm.aspx?m=3343130&mpage=26&key==



bluebird2

titleAndStar(1886,0,false,false,"","")
Non-Typical


[align=center][/align]
Posts: 1886
Joined: 4/4/2008
Status: online











window.google_render_ad();
[quoteHere are the results of the top two hundred rifle being combined with the top hundred bow entries:

Period……………………number entered……………………..average antler score
> - 1931.…………………….16.……………†¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦............170.0
1931-1940.………………….22.………………†¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.............170.3
1941-1950.………………….43.………………†¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.............175.4
1951-1960.………………….19.………………†¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.............172.6
1961-1970.………………….16.………………†¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.............169.1
1971-1980.………………….11.………………†¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.............165.6
1981-1990.………………….42.………………†¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.............168.4
1991-2000.………………….77.………………†¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.............164.3
2001 - >……………………..54.……………†¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.............168.3


Here is another way of looking at the data RSB posted. The biggest buck were produced from 1931 to 1970 , which was the period with the highest DD and the worst over browsing in the NC counties. As the herd was reduced from 1980 to the 1998 the average antler score decreased. Then from 1998 to the present the herd, the combined effects of a record deer population still didn't produce the quality of buck that were harvested in 1941 to 1950.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 AM.
Page 27 of 48
« First
17
25
26
27
28
29
37
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.