HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   Some nice bucks (pic) (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/287123-some-nice-bucks-pic.html)

bluebird2 02-23-2009 01:30 PM

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
Who wrote it and where did they get the info?

bluebird2 02-23-2009 01:34 PM

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

Notwithstanding.....that basket rack in RSB's first photo was considered a very nice trophy up until AR.
That is absolutely pure unadulterated horse puckey. I have dozens and dozens of old PGN that have loads of buck much bigger than the rack RSB posted.

BTBowhunter 02-23-2009 02:00 PM

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

That is absolutely pure unadulterated horse puckey. I have dozens and dozens of old PGN that have loads of buck much bigger than the rack RSB posted.
We all do. So what? The fact remains that the average buck today is substantially better than before AR and with very few exceptions, the biggest of today are much bigger then the biggest were before AR.

You're being in denial of that fact really erodes your credibility here and only serves to make us all very cynical in the odd case when you happen to post something that is correct

Cornelius08 02-23-2009 02:05 PM

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

We all do. So what? The fact remains that the average buck today is substantially better than before AR and with very few exceptions, the biggest of today are much bigger then the biggest were before AR.
Your out of your gourd. You better check the Pa record book entries. The top ten in any of the top categories havebarely been scratched since ar. (LOL)



BTBowhunter 02-23-2009 02:09 PM

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
Any monkey would recognize that the top trphies of all time arent all going to fall in a mere 5 years. Oh well, most monkeys anyway


bluebird2 02-23-2009 02:12 PM

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 

We all do. So what? The fact remains that the average buck today is substantially better than before AR and with very few exceptions, the biggest of today are much bigger then the biggest were before AR.
That also is pure nonsense and totally contradicts the research by Kroll, and Alsheimer and Dr. Demarias. Furthermore, it is an absolutely ridiculous claim when you consider that in 2002 we harvested 52K 2.5+ buck. Were the 2.5+ buck harvested in 2002 ,smaller than the 2.5+ buck harvested in 2003? Were 44.700 2.5+ buck harvested in 2001 , smaller than the 2.5+ buck harvested in 2003? You want ARs to be successful so bad that you deny reality.

Cornelius08 02-23-2009 02:12 PM

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 
"Cant wait to see all those albums full of pictures LOL "

Thats the problem. You know dang well I aint gonna go around and visit relatives and uncles and friends gathering photos so I can take pics of them to please you. Photos FULL of pics. (LOL) But just to make the point and shut you up, here are the bucks taken only by DAD during the early 70's. (time frame in question. As I said, no monsters. But ALL bigger than the joke pictured. But not nearly as big as bucks he and i and others have taken through the 80's and 90's.

1969



Cornelius08 02-23-2009 02:13 PM

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 


1970

Cornelius08 02-23-2009 02:15 PM

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 


1972

Cornelius08 02-23-2009 02:15 PM

RE: Some nice bucks (pic)
 


1972


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.