Valley Forge plans deer shoot
#31
Urban, suburban and park environments are vastly different from our North Central big woods.
Parks, suburban and urban areas have exponentially higher amounts of edge producingvastlyhigher amounts of forage.
Comparing the carrying capacity of a square mile of most 2G forest to a square mile of edge is kind of like comparing the fact that you can keep 200 humans alive with a 50 lb bag of rice daily vshow many you could feed every day at the all you can eat buffet
Parks, suburban and urban areas have exponentially higher amounts of edge producingvastlyhigher amounts of forage.
Comparing the carrying capacity of a square mile of most 2G forest to a square mile of edge is kind of like comparing the fact that you can keep 200 humans alive with a 50 lb bag of rice daily vshow many you could feed every day at the all you can eat buffet
#32
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Hopefully everyone can see a couple of things from these estimates. First we should be able to see how fast a deer population can increase when they have suitable habitat. Next everyone needs to recognize that these estimates indicate the deer herd is now in a state of decline, even without the influence of hunter harvests, due to over population. That really is a perfectly natural occurrence when populations reach the point of exceeding their habitat and food supply.
Parks, suburban and urban areas have exponentially higher amounts of edge producingvastly higher amounts of forage.
#33
Hello McFly! Anybody in there? The VF park is FED turf and the PGC has nothing to do with it.
Leave it to Blueboy to point out the differences between apples and oranges!
Leave it to Blueboy to point out the differences between apples and oranges!
#34
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
No one said that the PGC controlled the herd at VF or that they established DD goals for the park. But that doesn't negate the fact that the herd was still below the MSY carrying capacity at over 200 DPSM, in an area with heavily over browsed habitat.
#35
AND....that we hunters got HOSED by the PGC into accepting ridiculously low DD beacuse that is what they wanted us to believe the habitat was able to support. After the impending slaughter at VF, they plan on using contraceptives to maintain the herd at lower levels (that are ironically still over twice the highest DD goals set by the PGC for anyWMU in the state)....Why? Wouldn't that depleted habitat dothat for them, RSB? Seems they expect that as soon as the gun barrels cool down that the herd will come back with a vengeance. Even where DD near 300 dpsm have supposedly browsed everything in sight, the herd would return to a very high DD in short time with no hunting pressure. BTB< you spoke of al the edge habitat. What about the large amount of quality farmland composing 5A and 5B, yet the PGC set goals at 5 dpsm....this is not big woods, either. The blanket of HR covers the entire state, and very unfairly I might add.[:@]
#36
BTB< you spoke of al the edge habitat. What about the large amount of quality farmland composing 5A and 5B, yet the PGC set goals at 5 dpsm....this is not big woods, either. The blanket of HR covers the entire state, and very unfairly I might add.[:@]
Again, when left to depending onfacts provided by others, I lean toward believing the professionals over the armchair biologist.
#37
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
I do not have any experience with either of those WMU's so I really cant answer for those specific WMU's myself. This may or not be applicable, but similar goals have been stated for 2B and they are appropriate here because the square mileage includes buildings, streets, parking lots etc etc. That may or may not be a fair comparison but based on the fact that I believe its realistic here, I would lean toward it being realistic there.
#38
BTB, 5B (where I live) is composed of the cities of York and Lancaster, and some smaller towns, but the surplus of the area is rural mixed farms and woodlots...some sizable sections constituting the river hills region in the southern half of both of these counties. These southern tier counties routinely produce deer that weigh significantly more than their same age classmates in mountainous regions of the state. The fields of York and Lancaster counties, in the lower Susquehanna valley have a well deserved reputation for being some of the most fertile farmland in the state. So why the 5dpsm goal ? Not ot mention that the vast majority of it is private land with a few mediocre game lands thrown in.
#40
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: 3c pa
it seems to me they cut the herd down well below carring capacity in many or most areas id like to
know why for sure is it the timber, auto ins , or do they believe that a wmu can only hold 5 deer a mile
that seems doubtfull
the fed in vally forge well there was show on the history channnel yellowstone showing how they
messed that up and killed most of thoose animals so id trust them as much as pgc
know why for sure is it the timber, auto ins , or do they believe that a wmu can only hold 5 deer a mile
that seems doubtfull
the fed in vally forge well there was show on the history channnel yellowstone showing how they
messed that up and killed most of thoose animals so id trust them as much as pgc


