HuntingNet.com Forums
Page 2 of 4
1
2
3
4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA. (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/285433-rewards-doe-pa.html)

bluebird2 02-05-2009 03:32 PM
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
 

ORIGINAL: DougE

What the heck,isn't the USP offering up a $10,000 reward for any mountain lions shot?
You like to point to the 8% harvest rate in the study as an indication that hunters aren't harvesting enough deer to reduce the herd. However, the only reason they are offering a reward is so they get some data that comes closer to representing what is really happening.

Now here are the cold facts. From 2004 to 2007 the harvests in 4B reduced the PS DD from 23 DPSM to 18 DPSM and the herd in 2G dropped from 16 PS in 2004 to 10 PS DPSM in 2007. Therefore, the results form the doe survival study are highly flawed and the PGC is trying to correct that by offering a reward.

sproulman 02-05-2009 04:04 PM
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
 
ORIGINAL: bluebird2

ORIGINAL: DougE

What the heck,isn't the USP offering up a $10,000 reward for any mountain lions shot?
You like to point to the 8% harvest rate in the study as an indication that hunters aren't harvesting enough deer to reduce the herd. However, the only reason they are offering a reward is so they get some data that comes closer to representing what is really happening.

Now here are the cold facts. From 2004 to 2007 the harvests in 4B reduced the PS DD from 23 DPSM to 18 DPSM and the herd in 2G dropped from 16 PS in 2004 to 10 PS DPSM in 2007. Therefore, the results form the doe survival study are highly flawed and the PGC is trying to correct that by offering a reward.
here is sprouls DPSM for 2009 in clinton county,4

bowtruck 02-05-2009 04:07 PM
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
 
then my guess is sprouls area wont get to many rewards

BTBowhunter 02-05-2009 04:24 PM
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
 
ORIGINAL: bluebird2

ORIGINAL: DougE

What the heck,isn't the USP offering up a $10,000 reward for any mountain lions shot?
You like to point to the 8% harvest rate in the study as an indication that hunters aren't harvesting enough deer to reduce the herd. However, the only reason they are offering a reward is so they get some data that comes closer to representing what is really happening.

Now here are the cold facts. From 2004 to 2007 the harvests in 4B reduced the PS DD from 23 DPSM to 18 DPSM and the herd in 2G dropped from 16 PS in 2004 to 10 PS DPSM in 2007. Therefore, the results form the doe survival study are highly flawed and the PGC is trying to correct that by offering a reward.
Just like Babblebird to find a way to criticize an attempt to produce more accurate results to a study.

sproulman 02-05-2009 04:33 PM
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
 
ORIGINAL: bowtruck

then my guess is sprouls area wont get to many rewards


i think they may do study in same areas as before.

dont think for minute that localDCNR boys will not know where everyone of those doe are,they are making plans now for early in-line season to get that money.

bluebird2 02-05-2009 05:11 PM
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
 

ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter

ORIGINAL: bluebird2

ORIGINAL: DougE

What the heck,isn't the USP offering up a $10,000 reward for any mountain lions shot?
You like to point to the 8% harvest rate in the study as an indication that hunters aren't harvesting enough deer to reduce the herd. However, the only reason they are offering a reward is so they get some data that comes closer to representing what is really happening.

Now here are the cold facts. From 2004 to 2007 the harvests in 4B reduced the PS DD from 23 DPSM to 18 DPSM and the herd in 2G dropped from 16 PS in 2004 to 10 PS DPSM in 2007. Therefore, the results form the doe survival study are highly flawed and the PGC is trying to correct that by offering a reward.
Just like Babblebird to find a way to criticize an attempt to produce more accurate results to a study.
Wrong again. I didn't criticize the attempt to produce more accurate results. I simply pointed out the reason why it was necessary to offer the rewards and how wrong DougE and RSB were when they used the study to show claim the harvests weren't reducing the herd

DennyF 02-05-2009 05:34 PM
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
 
Mostly "just goes to show" the kind of things you think are funny,may only befunny to you and others that share yourviews.

Doubt most would think the loss of an expensive monitoring collar bought with our license dollars, isa laughing matter. Then again,theclown that put it on the truck probablythought it was as funny as you do?

Cornelius08 02-05-2009 05:43 PM
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
 

Cornelius08 02-05-2009 05:49 PM
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
 
You're worried about that "expensive" collar? Well I dont think blowingMILLIONS through the last several yearson "pushing agendas" and blowing cash on trying to brainwash us with habitat tours, hiring biodiversity nut biologists, pamphlets, online resources, open houses, videosand other nonsense is very funny either, but such is life.;)

BTBowhunter 02-05-2009 06:07 PM
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
 
ORIGINAL: Cornelius08

You're worried about that "expensive" collar? Well I dont think blowingMILLIONS through the last several yearson "pushing agendas" and blowing cash on trying to brainwash us with habitat tours, hiring biodiversity nut biologists, pamphlets, online resources, open houses, videosand other nonsense is very funny either, but such is life.;)




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:13 AM.
Page 2 of 4
1
2
3
4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.