PGC data flawed
02-10-2009 | 04:23 PM
#71
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: PGC data flawed
Original Explorer Jack:
For what purpose? Look at 2G. They know 2G can carry more deer yet they continue to slaughter off what they can instead of bring the deer herd up to carry capacity. So no the information don't matter to them cause they don't use it and continue on with their deer slaughter when they reach the holding capacity of deers in WMUs. So the only info they want is how to get money from taxes so they can go tell you hunters to take another flying !@#$ with your money.
For what purpose? Look at 2G. They know 2G can carry more deer yet they continue to slaughter off what they can instead of bring the deer herd up to carry capacity. So no the information don't matter to them cause they don't use it and continue on with their deer slaughter when they reach the holding capacity of deers in WMUs. So the only info they want is how to get money from taxes so they can go tell you hunters to take another flying !@#$ with your money.
Original Bluebird2:
The PGC already knows the antlerless harvests are still reducing the herd but they still claim they are stabilizing the herd. Better doe mortality info won't change that.
The PGC already knows the antlerless harvests are still reducing the herd but they still claim they are stabilizing the herd. Better doe mortality info won't change that.
It's beginning to appear that some people don't want to see better information. I can't imagine why any hunter would not want the data the PGC uses to be as accurate as possible especially with all the allegations that the PGC is mismanaging the deer from those who seem to object to seeking better informtion.
Could it be that more accurate information wouldn't support their agenda?
is allergic to the truth. I think he'd break out in hives and his feathers would fall out if he was required to speak it
02-10-2009 | 04:38 PM
#74
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: PGC data flawed
It's beginning to appear that some people don't want to see better information. I can't imagine why any hunter would not want the data the PGC uses to be as accurate as possible especially with all the allegations that the PGC is mismanaging the deer from those who seem to object to seeking better informtion.
02-10-2009 | 06:07 PM
#77
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: PGC data flawed
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
More accurate information means nothing if it is not applied properly. Alt knew there was no problem with the B/D ratio but lied about it. He knew the cause of late born fawns but lied about it. He knew that ARs wouldn't increase the rack size of 2.5+ buck ,but lied about. The PGC knows the antlerless harvests are reducing the herd but they are lying about it. More accurate data wouldn't have prevented any of those lies!!!
It's beginning to appear that some people don't want to see better information. I can't imagine why any hunter would not want the data the PGC uses to be as accurate as possible especially with all the allegations that the PGC is mismanaging the deer from those who seem to object to seeking better informtion.
02-10-2009 | 06:14 PM
#78
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: PA.
RE: PGC data flawed
i just got in from checking the feeders and putting out some more alfalfa.
i had camera up at different feeder to try to get idea HOW MANY DEER ARE COMING INTO EACH FEEDER.
well, i had 5 on this feeder i checked.
last feeder had 4 deer , 3 looked like 1.5 yr old deer,1 was a 2 year old or so.
this feeder that had 5,,,1 was a FAWN ,boy, i was happy to see that, next 3 looked like 1.5 yr old deer and again 1,, 2 yr old or so doe.
no bucks that i can see by holes in head.
all were very healthy looking and this was in area that WANNABEES were saying they are dying.
i had camera up at different feeder to try to get idea HOW MANY DEER ARE COMING INTO EACH FEEDER.
well, i had 5 on this feeder i checked.
last feeder had 4 deer , 3 looked like 1.5 yr old deer,1 was a 2 year old or so.
this feeder that had 5,,,1 was a FAWN ,boy, i was happy to see that, next 3 looked like 1.5 yr old deer and again 1,, 2 yr old or so doe.
no bucks that i can see by holes in head.
all were very healthy looking and this was in area that WANNABEES were saying they are dying.
02-11-2009 | 02:46 AM
#79
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: PGC data flawed
Thank you for proving once again that there is nothing the PGC could ever do that would meet with your approval.
02-11-2009 | 05:31 AM
#80
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,167
Likes: 0
From: PA
RE: PGC data flawed
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Wrong again. They could reduce the doe tag allocations and eliminate ARs. That would make a lot of hunters happy.
Thank you for proving once again that there is nothing the PGC could ever do that would meet with your approval.
Buy secretly preventing those hunting around him from killing any deer ,he is invaluable atsingle handily sabotaging the P.G.C. herd reduction program.[:-]
